The United State Committee on Finance has released a new report that determined Medtronic altered studies to show its Infuse spine device is better than devices manufactured by competitors, according to a New York Times report.
The Senate committee launched its investigation after the Spine Journal published a letter penned by a group of spine surgeons who alleged the Medtronic-funded studies did not fully explain the serious adverse outcomes associated with Infuse. The researchers connected with the Medtronic-funded reports rejected the notion that their research was inaccurate.
Following the journal's letter, the Senate finance committee reviewed Medtronic documents, which showed the device maker had paid $210 million to researchers conducting research on Infuse from 1996 to 2010. The committee also concluded Medtronic added language to make it seem Infuse was superior to competing products.
In response, Medtronic denied any involvement in editing or enhancing language in studies of its Infuse product and argued royalty payments to researchers aligned with industry practices.
Following the journal's letter, the Senate finance committee reviewed Medtronic documents, which showed the device maker had paid $210 million to researchers conducting research on Infuse from 1996 to 2010. The committee also concluded Medtronic added language to make it seem Infuse was superior to competing products.
In response, Medtronic denied any involvement in editing or enhancing language in studies of its Infuse product and argued royalty payments to researchers aligned with industry practices.
More Articles on Orthopedic Devices:
Orthofix Launches FORZA Spinal Spacer System
Zimmer Holdings Sees 0.6% Decline in 3Q Net Sales
RTI Biologics 3Q Revenue Increases 5% to $44.6M