Quantcast
Channel: Becker's Spine Review
Viewing all 23847 articles
Browse latest View live

5 Initiatives for Higher Operating Margins at Central Maine Orthopaedics

$
0
0
Central Maine Orthopaedics in Auburn, Maine is a large orthopedics practice with an adjoined ambulatory surgery center. Last year, the group reported its highest operating margins in the center's more than 15-year history, largely due to key initiatives implemented over the past few years.
"We're very fortunate here because we have a strong surgery center in terms of quality and financials, but in the past year we've experienced the strongest operating margins we've ever seen," says Michael Cox, CEO of Central Maine Orthopaedics. "We've been remodeling our systems approach and it paid huge dividends for us last year. The only general rule we live by is that we wouldn't cut anything if it impacted quality and/or superior patient outcomes. We have really interfaced our business on both the clinic and ASC side, and that synergy has paid off for us."

Here are the five key initiatives that lead Central Maine Orthopaedics to report its highest operating margins ever last year.

1. Staff engagement and accountability.
CMO requires a high level of commitment from their all members of their staff. The leaders engage clinical and administrative staff members alike to improve operations at the practice and surgery center.

"Our center is unusual in that our staff members have a voice in daily operations and performance improvement measures," says Anne Marie Kayashima, director of clinical and surgical services at Central Maine Orthopaedics. "Our staff members play a role in developing our strategic plan through ongoing initiatives and committees. If there is a problem we identify, such as volume changes, we can work with our staff members to identify the challenge, develop a solution and move the system forward."

Staff members are also encouraged to brainstorm ideas for improved efficiency at the practice and surgery center. Staff ideas have been implemented in the past for considerable cost-savings for CMO.

2. Cross train staff members.
Central Maine Orthopaedics has cross trained staff members from both the clinic and surgery center to address issues on both sides. This increased flexibility allows the practice to respond quickly to staffing changes in a cost-effective way.

"Over the course of the last few years we have been able to address costs and other strategic issues by cross training staff," says Jeffrey Wigton, director of operations at Central Maine Orthopaedics. "Through cross training we have been able to add clinical programs (and providers) while minimizing the increase in support staff costs."

Cross-trained staff can also help CMO maintain its position as the low cost, high quality provider in the marketplace. "That will keep us sustainable in the future," says Ms. Kayashima. "We've been a low cost leader for some time, but trying to maintain that position is a challenge."

3. Standardize implants.
Over the past few years, CMO has implemented an aggressive value analysis program to cut fat from their budget. Much of the extra expense lied within implant purchases, and the group has undertaken aggressive vendor price negotiations for gains in their bottom line.

"We worked with surgeons in the practice to organize a program where before bringing anything into the practice, it's vetted by the surgeons in the group until we have a consensus on what equipment and supplies we purchase," says Mr. Wigton. "This has allowed us to standardize our supplies and implants, minimize our inventory and bring new technology into the center in a responsible way."

Gaining consensus can be challenging among a large group of surgeons, but many are cooperative because they know in the future there will be supplies they'll want to introduce as well.

"It's a gradual process to develop a space where the surgeons feel comfortable to discuss supply options because nobody wants to tell another surgeon what they can and can't use," says Mr. Wigton. "However, we lay out very clearly the cost/benefit of any item and the surgeons are very sensitive to costs. When they sit around the room in an advisory committee meeting, they have their business hats on and they know how to make good decisions."

The trick often is making sure they can put their business hats back on when they are in the operating room when a vendor is showing them new devices. "They have to remember they are business owners," says Mr. Wigton. "It's one thing for them to agree to the consensus, but it's another to actually practice it."

4. Develop interdepartmental pre-operative case review.
In 2012, CMO implemented a program aimed at developing a 'circle of accountability' across multiple departments.  Each case is reviewed by the purchasing department and the billing department. This gives the purchasing department an opportunity to cross-check the current case against historical information, and at this time costs are studied and supplies volumes are check.  If there are considerable cost increases, the purchasing department has a conversation with the surgeon to determine if the case can be done cost effectively without sacrificing a good outcome for the patient.

The purchasing department hands the information gathered to the billing department.  The surgery authorization specialist cross-checks the costs with what insurance will cover. Generating this information prior to the case allows the billing department to educate the patient prior to surgery.  

“We don't want the patient to be surprised after the fact. We want our patients to know what they can expect to pay out of pocket in advance of their surgery," says Jan Fournier, Chief Financial Officer. "Educating our patients upfront, whether uninsured, underinsured or adequately insured involves them in the process and together we have the conversation about what makes the most sense for them and for CMO. In rare cases, that may mean moving a case to the hospital."

Other benefits CMO has experienced include that equipment needs are known early on in the process so the purchasing clerk can make necessary arrangements in a timely fashion avoiding unnecessary scheduling delays. Surgeons also become more aware of the costs associated with their equipment and implant choices leading to more informed decision making.

5. Cost compare capital purchases.
Over the next year, CMO plans to purchase new arthroscopy towers. Capital purchases add significant expense to the bottom line for surgery centers, but also present an opportunity to reduce operating expenses if the capital purchase can be used to leverage lower pricing on implants and disposables.

"We started working with one vendors and had all the big players come to the table," says Mr. Wigton. "This approach has significantly disrupted the market. We have arthroscopy vendors that do not have an implantable line team up with other vendors that do to pull together very creative proposals. This has taken on a life of its own. We now have several initiatives to decrease our costs for the both the capital equipment as well as disposables. What it will take from the surgeons is a commitment to a single vendor for a substantial portion of our business."

The practice may be able to save a significant amount of money on implantables in addition to savings on the arthroscopy towers.

"The market is consolidating and these large companies can sell you the whole package from capital equipment to implantables," says Mr. Wigton. "They can put together some pretty creative packages if you are willing to consolidate and contract with them. In the past we tried to beat up on vendors for better prices and we made some progress there, but I think this year we've found a new opportunity."

More Articles on Surgery Centers:

5 Observations on Spine Surgery Heading to Outpatient Procedures

Future Surgery Center Transaction & Acquisition Expectations: Q&A With Todd Mello of HealthCare Appraisers

5 Key Technologies for Efficiency & Profitability at Surgery Centers



DePuy Synthes Shoulder Arthroscopy Device Available Worldwide

$
0
0
DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction's GLOBAL UNITE Platform Shoulder Arthroscopy System is now available for physicians' use worldwide.
The GLOBAL UNITE has 72 sizing configurations to fit each unique patient and its collar structure is designed to return the shoulder to an anatomical position, according to the release. The system also has FDA 510(k) clearance.

More Articles on Devices:
Best Practices for Medical Device Reprocessing: Q&A With Stryker Sustainability Solutions President Brian White
Independent Study Compares Kiva, Balloon Kyphoplasty
Medtronic 3Q 2013 Earnings Up 5.7%, Spine Revenue Down 4%

Effective Tactics for Politically Active Spine Surgeons: Q&A With Dr. Karl Swann of Neurosurgical Associates of San Antonio

$
0
0
Dr. Karl Swann on spine surgeonsKarl W. Swann, MD, of Neurosurgical Associates of San Antonio, discusses the importance of physician leadership and how surgeons can become politically active today.

Q: What are the opportunities for spine surgeons to grow into leaders today?


Dr. Karl Swann:
There are so many ways spine surgeons can be leaders today, either within their own practice, the hospital where they work, university departments or within medical societies. It's also very important for us to cooperate with our colleagues and amongst ourselves. Our field includes both orthopedic spine and neurosurgeons, and communication between the two specialties is very important. We are also seeing surgeons take more of a lead in politics and economics as healthcare moves to the forefront of policy agenda.

Q: How can spine surgeons influence public policy?


KS:
We need to get involved in both local and state politics. That doesn't necessarily mean running for office — some have in Texas, but you don't have to run to make a difference. You can get involved in campaigns and contribute to campaigns. Physicians have been reluctant to contribute to campaigns in the past, but we are getting beaten by other entities in terms of lobbying efforts. Other professionals place a greater emphasis on political involvement at all levels, and we need to focus more on that.

It's important for surgeons to form a relationship with politicians and hold fundraisers for them. In San Antonio, you'd be amazed at what happens for local politicians who start their offices here. We had a lawyer who specialized in medical malpractice who then ran to be a judge and then went to the Texas Supreme Court. He was eventually elected as the state Attorney General and is now a U.S. Senator from Texas.

His pathway illustrates how when you get involved in politics locally, sometimes you can follow politicians through their careers.

Q: How would you recommend surgeons start becoming politically involved?


KS:
I'd recommend just starting; they should go to a fundraiser, figure out who organized that fundraiser and speak with members of the campaign. Surgeons would be very surprised to hear that their input is desired, and it's especially valuable if they are able to gather a significant number of physicians at a single fundraisers. Most campaigns are receptive to that.

Q: When surgeons want to voice their opinions to elective representatives, how is the best way to make sure they are communicating effectively?


KS:
It's very important to be in the position to get your message across to politicians, but you have to take a balanced approach when dealing with them. You don't want to be perceived as a one-issue person. That has served me well in dealing with politicians. Take the approach that you want to make your point, but understand the other aspects of the issue and how the other constituents for that politician might be impacted by whatever it is you are discussing.

We had great success in Texas in 2003 with tort reform. We have one of the best malpractice reform laws in the country and it's largely because we had a governor, Rick Perry, who was willing to partner with physicians and other politicians to draw up legislation to pass tort reform. Governor Perry, along with physicians and his wife — who was a nurse — lobbied to help a constitutional amendment pass at the state level that really solidified the tort reform law.

Q: What advice do you have for surgeons just beginning to enter this arena?


KS:
My advice would be to build the relationship gradually. Don't expect everything to happen all at once. Find politicians that you are very excited about supporting and chances are there is a good reason you are excited; that person is a good politician. Find someone you trust, someone who you think is upwardly mobile and has an interest in what is happening in medicine — in surgery in particular — and support them throughout their career.

More Articles on Spine Surgeons:

8 Payor Trends for Spine Surgery to Watch

7 Spine Surgeons With New Leadership Positions

5 Potentially Beneficial Partnerships for Orthopedic Spine Surgeons

Spine Surgeons Use Mazor Robotics to Place Over 1,000 Implants Percutaneously

$
0
0
Mazor Robotics surgical guidance system Renaissance has placed 1,019 implants percutaneously, accounting for 25 percent of all cases involving Renaissance systems.
The Renaissance system is used in 40 spine centers across the world. Mazor Robotics is an international company that creates surgical guidance systems designed to make a safe surgical environment.

More Articles on Spine:

8 Payor Trends for Spine Surgery to Watch
9 Hospitals Expanding Orthopedic and Spine Services

5 Potentially Beneficial Partnerships for Orthopedic Spine Surgeons




Medtronic Recognizes Dr. Moby Parsons as Advanced Energy Surgeon

$
0
0
Director of the Joint Replacement Center at Seacoast Orthopedics & Sports Medicine Moby Parsons, MD, has been recognized as a 2012 Advanced Energy Surgeon of the Year by Medtronic Advanced Energy, according to a Seacoast Online report.
Dr. Parsons was nominated by a former patient who underwent a total shoulder replacement and needed special care as a result of a genetic abnormality increasing systemic clotting, according to the report.

Dr. Parsons earned his medical degree at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York and completed his residency at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. His additional training includes a shoulder and elbow fellowship at the University of Washington Medical Center in Seattle and the University of Sydney Royal North Shore Hospital in Australia.

More Articles on Sports Medicine:

Dr. Michael Shin Earns Subspecialty Certificate in Orthopedic Sports Medicine

Colorado Springs Health Partners Opens Sports Medicine Clinic

Dr. Douglas Freedberg Performs Knee Surgery on Athletics Pitcher Grant Balfour


7 Things for Spine Surgeons to Know for Thursday

$
0
0
Here are seven things for spinal surgeons to know for Feb. 21, 2013.
1. Minimally invasive spine market may top $2B.
The U.S. market for minimally invasive spine technologies is expected to grow to $2 billion by 2017, according to the Millennium Research Group. Much of the growth is expected from minimally invasive spine fusion, but the smaller facet fixation segment will also increase in revenue, according to the report.

2. Dr. Richard Kube performed Illinois' first coflex implant.

Richard Kube II, MD, performed the first procedure using the coflex Interlaminar Implant in Illinois, as well as the first two level coflex implant, both at the Southern Illinois Surgery Center in Marion.

3. Republicans work to repeal IPAB.
Republican senators have reintroduced a bill to repeal the Independent Payment Advisory Board — a structure the lawmakers say will result in healthcare rationing, according to a report from The Hill.

4. Medtronic's BMP sales continue to decline.
Medical device company Medtronic reported 4 percent drop in spine revenue for the third quarter of the 2013 fiscal year, driven primarily by declines in BMP and BKP. BMP revenue declined 21 percent on a constant currency basis and the company reported it is now focused on differentiating its spine business with enabling technologies such as imaging, navigation and power surgical instruments.

5. Researchers linked gene with spine tumors.
A team of researchers may have identified a gene responsible for causing spinal meningioma, the most common form of spinal tumors. The team used genetic sequencing to identify the gene SMARCE1 and see that changes in the gene led to tumor growth in some families.

6. Mazor Robotics systems have placed 1,000 spine implants.
Mazor Robotics surgical guidance system Renaissance has placed 1,019 implants percutaneously, accounting for 25 percent of all cases involving Renaissance systems. The Renaissance system is used in 40 spine centers across the world.

7. Bioactive film could improve PEEK device bonding.
Researchers have discovered a bioactive film that improves the bonding quality of PEEK spine and surgical devices. The research team used a bioactive coating comprised of yttria-stabilized zirconia and hydroxyapatite, which protect the PEEK material from melting. The coating process creates a more stable device with stronger bonding to surrounding bone.

More Articles on Spine:
Central Peninsula Hospital Spine Program Successful, to Expand in 2013
Spine Surgeons Use Mazor Robotics to Place Over 1,000 Implants Percutaneously
Effective Tactics for Politically Active Spine Surgeons: Q&A With Dr. Karl Swann of Neurosurgical Associates of San Antonio




Developing Payor Relationships: 3 Spine Surgeons' Tips

$
0
0
Three spine surgeons discuss best tips for developing productive relationships with payors.
Ask Spine Surgeons is a weekly series of questions posed to spine surgeons around the country about clinical, business and policy issues affecting spine care. We invite all spine surgeon and specialist responses. Next week's question: What advice would you give to a spine surgeon just beginning his or her career?

Please send responses to Heather Linder at hlinder@beckershealthcare.com by Wednesday, Jan. 27, at 5 p.m. CST.


Jeffrey Wang, MD, UCLA Spine Center: I think communication and education are the keys. [Insurance companies] are trying to make a profit and still satisfy their customers. We are trying to do the best for our patients, and doing what is right. We also want to mindful of the costs, but our patient's well-being comes first. I would hope that they understand these concepts and try to make it easier for us to take care of our patients. The best tip is to understand their point of view and try to communicate with this in mind. Unfortunately, often times the representatives of the payors are looking at cost savings rather than patient care. If you try to see their viewpoint, it will help you understand why they do what they do. You still may not agree with them, and often I do not agree with them, but I try to understand them.

Jeffrey Goldstein, MD, Director of Spine Service, NYU Langone Medical Center's Hospital for Joint Diseases: Try to work "with" payors and not against them. If you approach a payor with disdain it only makes it easier for them to respond to your fury and not to your concern regarding your patient. Understand the level 1 evidence that supports your treatment plan. Always advocate for your patient and follow through on appeals. Remember, your patient is their best advocate. Keep them involved. You are your patient's physician and nobody knows your patient's condition and treatment options better than you. There is help out there. There are advocacy resources such as the International Advocates for Spine Patients, an affiliate of ISASS. Additionally, there are other resources to help you and your patients achieve their goals such as the Better Way Back. Take advantage of these resources and focus on what is best for your patient.

Ara Deukmedjian, MD, Neurosurgeon and CEO, Deuk Spine Institute, Melbourne, Fla.: Go out of network. Payors simply don't want a productive relationship with you if you plan on costing them any money. I recommend you approach your payor relationships with caution. There are many ways to not get paid for the services you render and only one or two to get what you deserve.

More Articles on Spine:
8 Payor Trends for Spine Surgery to Watch
CEO Daniel Goldberg to Advise Physicians on Generating Patients at ISASS Conference
Dr. Morgan Lorio: Current Concepts in Vertebral Augmentation


Final Rule Issued by HHS on PPACA's Essential Health Benefits

$
0
0
Today, HHS issued a final rule on essential health benefits that must be covered when health insurance is expanded in 2014.
Starting Jan. 1, 2014, under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, health insurers will have to cover essential health benefits in the individual and small group plans sold on the health insurance marketplaces. Benefits will also apply to people who qualify for Medicaid under the health law's Medicaid expansion.

EHB include items and services in 10 specific categories:

•    Ambulatory patient services
•    Emergency services
•    Hospitalization
•    Maternity and newborn care
•    Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behaviorial health treatment
•    Prescription drugs
•    Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
•    Lab services
•    Preventive/wellness services and chronic disease management
•    Pediatric services, including oral and vision care

However, states will have flexibility in determining how much coverage of EHB will be required. States can choose benchmark plans from options in their markets that are "equal in scope to a typical employer plan.

The final rule also outlined actuarial values, or "metal levels," of health plans that will offer EHB. When the health plans go live in 2014 on the insurance marketplaces, they must cover a certain percentage of the costs. These values are outlined in four metal tiers: bronze, silver, gold and platinum.

Bronze plans have an actuarial value of 60 percent, silver plans 70 percent, gold plans 80 percent and platinum plans 90 percent. This means that individuals who choose a bronze plan, for example, would be expected to pay 40 percent of their healthcare through deductibles, copays and other cost-sharing features, while the health insurer covers 60 percent.

Today's final rule finalizes many of the Obama administration's policies that were originally proposed in November.

To read the entire 149-page final rule, click here (pdf).

More Articles on health insurance:
17 Healthcare Niches — Observations for 2013
Effective Tactics for Politically Active Spine Surgeons: Q&A With Dr. Karl Swann of Neurosurgical Associates of San Antonio
5 Initiatives for Higher Operating Margins at Central Maine Orthopaedics



Simpson-Bowles Sequester Fix May Include $600B in Healthcare Cuts

$
0
0
Within the latest $2.4 trillion deficit-reduction plan floated by president-appointed bipartisan budget watchdogs Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles is $600 billion in spending cuts to healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal.
The White House has previously drawn the line for healthcare cuts at $400 billion.

The plan set up by Mr. Simpson and Mr. Bowles, a Republican and Democrat, respectively, to avoid $85 billion in automatic cuts — better known as sequestration — effective March 1 would fall above President Barack Obama's mark of $1.5 trillion over the next decade but below Republicans' aim of $4 trillion without new taxes.

The healthcare spending reductions would come from "provider and beneficiary incentives," as well as shrinking provider payments, cost-sharing, raising premiums for the wealthy, reducing drug costs and improving efficiency in healthcare, according to the report.

More Articles on Healthcare Reform:
Final Rule Issued by HHS on PPACA's Essential Health Benefits
5 Observations on Spine Surgery Heading to Outpatient Procedures
6 Top Advocacy Issues for North American Spine Society


5 Points on Orthopedic Surgeon Preferences for New Payment Models

$
0
0
Here are five points on orthopedic surgeon preferences for new payment models.
1. Value-based programs. According to the LocumTenens.com Annual Compensation and Employment Survey completed in the spring of 2012, orthopedic surgeons have a moderate familiarity and comfort level with value-based payment programs. On a scale of one to five, with one being "very unfamiliar" and five being "very familiar," orthopedic surgeons ranked themselves as a "three" when it comes to value-based programs. On average, orthopedic surgeon respondents would expect a 32 percent bonus to participate in accountable or value-based care programs, but would only agree to risk about 7 percent of their income in exchange for a potential bonus, according to the report.

2. Bundled payments.
Orthopedic surgeons are more comfortable with bundled payments than shared savings arrangements and value-based programs, according to the LocumTenens.com report. They ranked around "3.5" on a five-point familiarity scale and ranked around "2.5" on their average comfort level for bundled payments. Orthopedic surgeons reported having slightly higher comfort with bundled payments that have risk protection than programs without risk protection, and only 38 percent of orthopedic surgeons reported bundled payments as their preferred payment model.

3. Pay-for-performance.
The most popular payment model for orthopedic surgeons was pay-for-performance, which 46 percent said they would prefer over bundled payments and shared savings arrangements in the LocumTenens.com report. Orthopedic surgeons were most comfortable with the pay-for-performance model — ranking themselves at nearly four on a five-point familiarity scale and a three on comfort.

4. Shared savings arrangements.
Orthopedics surgeons were least familiar and least comfortable with shared savings programs. They ranked themselves as a 2.25 on the five-point familiarity scale and slightly over two on the five-point comfort level scale, according to the LocumTenens.com report. However, 16 percent said shared savings was their preferred payment model, which was higher than bundled payment programs without risk protection.

5. Accountable care organizations.
The Medscape Orthopedist and Orthopedic Surgeon Compensation Report conducted in early 2012 showed that only 2 percent of orthopedic surgeons were currently participating in accountable care organizations, while another 5 percent expected to join one over the next year. Around 64 percent felt ACOs would cause a decline in income, with 38 percent feeling it would be a large decline. In the LocumTenens.com survey, orthopedic surgeons said their preferred payor was Medicare for accountable care organizations, with 24 percent. Another 21 percent said they would prefer commercial insurers while 8 percent said they would prefer Medicaid. The remaining 61 percent they would prefer not to participate in an accountable care or value-based care arrangement.

More Articles on Orthopedic Surgeons:

10 Compensation Statistics for Orthopedic Surgeons

6 Tips to Increase Orthopedic Practice Patient Volume

5 Healthcare Reform Threats to Orthopedic Surgeons & How to Overcome Them


Bolger Donates $1M to Valley Hospital for O-Arm Imaging System

$
0
0
The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, N.J, purchased the O-Arm imaging system with a $1 million donation from philanthropist David Bolger and became the first hospital in northern New Jersey to offer spine and brain surgery with this imaging technology, according to a Ridgewood-GlenRockPatch report.                       
The O-arm Imaging System is designed to provide surgeons real-time images during surgery in order to maximize precision. The O-arm technology is optimal for spine and orthopedic surgeries.

More Articles on Spine:
7 Things for Spine Surgeons to Know for Thursday
Developing Payor Relationships: 3 Spine Surgeons' Tips
8 Payor Trends for Spine Surgery to Watch



Spine Surgery Coverage for New Technology Post Healthcare Reform: Q&A With Dr. Gunnar Andersson of Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush

$
0
0
Spine Surgery has rapidly advanced over the past few decades to include many new minimally invasive devices and procedures, revolutionizing the field. However, not all advances have been reimbursed by insurance companies, and device companies find continued challenges in bringing new ideas to the market.


Gunnar Andersson, MD, chairman emeritus of the department of orthopedic surgery at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, is a Board Member of the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery and is vice chair of its patient advocacy group, International Advocates for Spine Patients. He discusses the primary issues facing new innovation to gain clearance from the Food and Drug Administration and reimbursement from insurance companies, post healthcare reform.

Q: Where does the relationship between spine surgeons and the device industry stand today?


Dr. Gunnar Andersson:
The relationship between the industry and the physician community has been under considerable scrutiny in recent years. In fact, many of the companies have paid large penalties and accepted review from independent representatives of the government although they haven't agreed they did anything illegal. This happened widely in the joint industry, but the spine industry hasn't been spared.

I think all parties agree that relationships between surgeons and device companies are important because physicians are the ones who identify problems and weaknesses and opportunites for improvement. Physicians also have unique knowledge about surgical techniques and instrumentation. On the other hand, the surgeons can't solve the problems alone; they need support from industry to develop ideas and produce new products and to advance new products through the regulatory process. We need each other, but we also need to manage conflicts of interest appropriately.

Q: There are several new regulations from the FDA with healthcare reform. How has this process affected innovation?


GA:
It has generally become more difficult and expensive to obtain FDA approval. The bar has been raised. Further, FDA approval is no longer a guarantee for commercialization. It used to be that when products were approved by the Food and Drug Administration they were also reimbursed by the payor community; that is no longer the case. In many instances, not only do we have to provide sufficient information for the Food and Drug Administration to approve a new technology, but we also need to have additional scientific information about the efficacy of the product for third party payors to reimburse.

One stumbling block to reimbursement has been the ability for a company to get a CPT code that can be attached to the use of a new product. In some cases the AMA, which is in charge of the CPT process, has approached products in the Category III group, which is considered experimental and therefore often not reimbursed. To move from Category III to Category I you must collect additional information and convince the CPT committee a change is appropriate. It's a long and cumbersome road and we at ISASS want to do what we can to make the process as simple and fair as possible in the interest of our patients.

Q: What will it take for device companies and surgeons to meet FDA approval and receive adequate reimbursement in the future?


GA:
The criteria to become FDA approved are different from the criteria to be reimbursed, but both require high quality clinical research. The FDA does not by statute require evidence of superiority (although sometimes they will want a trail to be a superiority trial), but they do require proof that a product is effective and that it is safe, meaning that probably benefits outweigh probable risk. The third party payor community on the other hand has comparative effectiveness and superiority requirements. This is a problem for industries who even though they have an FDA approved products cannot introduce the product to the market because it is not reimbursed.

If you are a small company it may not be possible to go back to your investors and ask for additional funding to run another study, and without the cash flow there is no other source of funding for a superiority trial, which may cost $10 million to 20 million. It is an unfortunate circle because there is no question that many existing products can be improved on and there are many new ideas, which never become reality because of the cost.

Game changing technology is even more difficult to introduce because it often raises the cost to third party payors who are reluctant to pay a premium for something that already can be accomplished with a less expensive solution.

There are some good examples, such as the lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedure, which was a game-changer and has received wide acceptance for reimbursement by the majority of payors. There are however, many examples of terrific ideas, which never made it to the patient.

Q: How are insurance companies reacting to the increased costs for medical devices? What are their primary concerns?


GA:
There is no question that technology is a major cost driver in healthcare. Insurance companies are concerned with at least two things when looking at new technology: the increase in cost for management of a disease which is already managed by other methods and an increased use of a procedure in patients who actually marginally qualify. In both cases there is an increase in cost which needs to be justified in terms of benefit to the patient community they insure.

Insurance companies do technology assessments when new devices arrive on the market and they should. It's no secret that we are gradually getting to the point where we can't allow healthcare costs to grow further. At the same time new products have to be given an opportunity in the best of our patients.

I have my own ideas about how to address the problems discussed. FDA approval is an important step for a product because that's the method by which the product is determined to be reasonably safe and efficacious. Once FDA approved, the third party payors should give the product a chance, but at the same time industry cannot expect to charge a high premium for new technology that replaces existing technology until the new technology has documented its value, at which time the market will decide. These products should not be considered experimental and should receive a temporary code. If a new product is better or safer or easier to use than the existing alternative, it will be successful.

Q: How is ISASS partnering with the industry to overcome reimbursement issues?


GA:
So we will argue that introducing a new product to the market at the same price as the technology you are replacing does not cover the cost of development, regulatory approvals, legal costs, intellectual property costs and marketing, but it allows the product to be tested. There are many products that aren't available in the US because companies haven't been able to raise money to get them approved, while they are successfully used outside the US.

Additionally, some of the venture capital in the area has dried up because the investment community is looking at the US market and concluding that if you cannot get a product to the market and reimbursed, it does not make any difference how good the idea is. According to some sources, taking a product to the European market is $5 million to $10 million while the cost to obtain FDA approval could be $50 million to $75 million.

Q: What are your goals for proactively approaching coverage changes in the future?


GA:
We strongly believe in having an open dialogue with industry and listening to their concerns. We want to present the physician community's views on new technology and technological development. We want to aid in obtaining appropriate CPT codes and reimbursement for products our members consider essential to optimal patient care. We consider it important to create access to new technology so surgeons can determine for themselves whether they think it is beneficial or not once it has been appropriately approved by the FDA. I think we need to be realistic in our expectations; major changes will likely not occur in reimbursement, but we would like to work with all involved parties in developing reasonable standards of accepting new technology and help develop better guidelines than the ones that currently exist.

ISASS is a patient-centered organization. Our goal is to provide the best possible outcome for patients with spinal disorders. We strongly believe that current treatment can be improved on and that there is an important place for new developments and new technology. Pain relief and improved function should go hand in hand and results should be consistent and durable. Further, the surgical procedure should be safe and cause the least possible pain and suffering to our patients. We also strongly believe that our members should have access to the best possible tools to manage their patients.

More Articles on Spine Surgery:

8 Payor Trends for Spine Surgery to Watch

7 Spine Surgeons With New Leadership Positions

5 Observations on Spine Surgery Heading to Outpatient Procedures


Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Awards First Blue Distinction for Spine Specialty Care

$
0
0
Today, the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association awarded a Blue Designation, with expanded qualifications, in the area of spine surgery.
A Blue Distinction was also given in the area of knee and hip replacement. The BCBSA has added new health and safety quality measures and cost-efficiency measures to the designations of its Blue Distinction award.

More Articles on Spine:                                                                                                                             
8 Payor Trends for Spine Surgeons to Watch
Effective Tactics for Politically Active Spine Surgeons: Q&A With Dr. Karl Swann of Neurosurgical Associates of San Antonio
Encouraging Surgeon & Administrator Collaboration: Dr. John Pracyk and Patrick Vega                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

American Joint Replacement Registry Names 3 Surgeons to Board of Directors

$
0
0
The American Joint Replacement Registry board of directors named three surgeons to leadership positions, according to an AAOS Now report.
William J. Maloney, MD, of Stanford University School of Medicine, was named chairman. Terence J. Gioe, MD, of the University of Minnesota Veterans Affairs Medical Center was named vice-chair and Steven H. Stern, MD, of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine was named secretary and treasurer.

More Articles on Sports Medicine:

Dr. Heinz Hoenecke Performs Elbow Surgery on Padres' Rymer Liriano

Colorado Springs Health Partners Opens Sports Medicine Clinic

Dr. Douglas Freedberg Performs Knee Surgery on Athletics Pitcher Grant Balfour


FDA 510(k) Clearance Times Improved in 2011

$
0
0
Data analysis from the Emergo Group showed FDA's 510(k) medical device premarket notification review times improved in 2011, according to Today's Medical Developments.
The group's data revealed that the rate of 510(k) submissions cleared within three months improved to 42 percent in 2011 from 40 percent in 2010. Average review times also fell to 138 days in 2011 from 146 days in 2010.

Most Class II, as well as some Class I and III medical devices, must receive FDA 510(k) premarket notification prior to being sold commercially in the U.S. Half of the devices submitted for clearance in 2011 were orthopedic, cardiovascular, general and plastic surgery or radiology-related.

More Articles on Devices:
Spine Surgery Coverage for New Technology Post Healthcare Reform: Q&A With Dr. Gunnar Andersson of Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
Smith & Nephew Names Dr. Michael Friedman to Board of Directors
ulrich medical Markets Spinal Fixation System in US



Dr. Michael Graham First in Texas to Perform Surgery With Secure-C Artificial Disc

$
0
0
At St. Luke's Lakeside Hospital in Montgomery, Texas, Michael Graham, MD, PhD, FAAOS, performed the first surgical spine operation involving the Secure-C artificial disc in the state, according to a report by The Paper Magazine.
The Secure-C artificial disc is designed to simulate the natural range of motion of a spinal disc in the neck, therefore allowing the patient to function as normally as possible.

Dr. Graham, board-certified orthopedic surgeon, earned his medical degree from The University of Texas Medical School at Houston and completed his fellowship in spine surgery at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston.

More Articles on Spine:
Spine Surgeons Use Mazor Robotics to Place Over 1,000 Implants Percutaneously
8 Payor Trends for Spine Surgery to Watch
9 Hospitals Expanding Orthopedic and Spine Services



Texas Spine & Joint Hospital Unveils $27M Expansion, Renovation

$
0
0
Texas Spine & Joint Hospital in Tyler has unveiled a $27 million expansion and renovation of its facility, according to a Tyler Morning Telegraph report.
The project included the addition of three pain procedure rooms, admitting offices, pharmacy, laboratory and a surgical pre-operation area.

However, the project is not completely done. Two new operating rooms are yet to be added to the existing three and renovations are yet to be completed.

More Articles on Orthopedic Centers:

Hospital for Special Surgery Buys $31M Site for Expansion
10 New Orthopedic Practice Expansions & Mergers
Using Bundled Payments in Orthopedics to Begin Developing a Center of Excellence


5 Strategies for Success With Independent Spine Practices

$
0
0
Five orthopedic and spine practice administrators discuss their strategies for running a successful practice.

1. Keep practice contracts flexible. With today's healthcare environment changing so rapidly, it's important to keep any contracts your practice makes — with the hospital or otherwise — flexible. "Maintain as much flexibility with your practice as possible," says William Stevens, MD, founder of the Center for Spinal Disorders and OSNA member in Phoenix. "The smaller your practice, the more flexibility you need on long term deals, such as lease contracts. Any type of long term contracts should be evaluated carefully because you don't know where you will be over the next few years."

Structure long term contracts so it will be acceptable if you have to make a change, whether due to future hospital alignment or another unforeseen occurrence. Large groups of orthopedic and spine surgeons are less dependent on this flexibility because they have more negotiating power with other entities in healthcare.

"When a practice is acquired by a hospital group, there is often a loss of flexibility in terms of patient referrals and other practice functions," says Dr. Stevens. "In Phoenix, the primary care physicians are selling their practice to the hospital networks and are required to refer within the network, even if they aren't happy with the quality of care from those surgeons. In the end, it really comes down to providing good care and being able to document the quality, which can be used in negotiations with payors and hospitals for options other than direct employment."

2. Create checks and balances for financial issues. The practice's finances must be handled with care and should include checks and balances to make sure all the numbers come out right. Dennis Crandall, MD, founder and medical director of Sonoran Spine Center in Mesa, Ariz., has implemented "safety" or "accountability" protocols in how the office staff handles cash, billing and posting.

"Make sure all of the money issues have redundancy in their processes so that you are comfortable the system is going to work," says Dr. Crandall. "Employees should have a sense that they can't be dishonest and not have it noticed. It will be noticed."

You can create a management team to oversee these issues or design the processes so everyone is accountable for their actions.

3. Invest in information technology. Patients, payors and referring physicians will demand reported outcomes in the future, and the best way to collect this information is through a good healthcare information technology system. These systems should interact with hospitals and other providers so you can stay on the same page.

"Invest in information technology in a way that you can measure and report outcomes, whether to payors or hospital systems, to prove what you are doing," says Todd Albert, MD, spine surgeon and president of Rothman Institute in Philadelphia. "Be able to measure patient satisfaction as well. All these things are publicly reported, so know what they are and be ahead of the curve before your statistics end up in the newspaper."

Once you are able to track your outcomes and define your quality, insurance companies and policy makers will come to you as they create treatment protocols. "You have to prove your method works, not just say it does," says Dr. Albert.

4. Provide patient care coordination. One of the reasons why DISC was able to contract with the U.S. Olympic Team and Red Bull athletes is their ability to provide quick coordinated care. The center has a VIP athlete coordinator to arrange each athlete's care before they arrive at the practice. Many times the athletes are flown in from locations around the country; once they arrive, the coordinator has their appointments with different specialists scheduled so the care is as seamless as possible.

"Our VIP athlete coordinator takes the call from Red Bull America or the Olympic athletes and coordinates their appointments," says Robert S. Bray, MD, a neurological spine surgeon based in Marina del Rey, Calif. "If a BMX Biker for Red Bull North America goes down, they want to call up and have the athlete imaged, diagnosed and treated the next day so they can return to practice as soon as possible. Many times, the treatments aren't surgical and we can provide them the same day. With that kind of concierge sports medicine, we were able to develop our relationships with elite athletes."

5. Explore initiatives to lower the cost of care. One of the biggest efforts of healthcare reform is lowering the cost of care. Stephen Hochschuler, MD, co-founder of Texas Back Institute, is working with his colleagues on several initiatives to lower the cost of care while remaining profitable as an independent spine practice. One of the potential opportunities will be investing in an ambulatory surgery center in the future, which will lower the cost of the minimally invasive procedures performed there and enhance the practice's ancillary revenue stream.

"Our hospital chain agreed to build 30 surgery centers over the next three years with a corporate partner," says Dr. Hochschuler. "For the average spine or orthopedic surgeon, this is a great opportunity to be part of the operation structure and make ancillary income where their own healthcare dollar is being tremendously compromised. That's a huge potential lucrative area for Texas Back, and we are looking at that very seriously."

Texas Back Institute is also invested in two physician-owned hospitals, although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 has restricted their growth. ASCs may be the most viable way for surgeons to own and control their surgical environment in the future.

Another initiative Dr. Hochschuler has become involved in is cost control of implants. He works with PDP, which could be the disruptive business model of the future. PDP allows providers to purchase implants from manufacturers at the wholesale price, cutting out the distributor.

"The middle man is the distribution network, which gets 12 to 38 percent of the sale," says Dr. Hochschuler. "If you can get rid of the middle man, you can lower the cost of implants. PDP has a great model."

In the future, Texas Back Institute will be looking at bundled payments and other ways to assume risk in accordance with national healthcare provider trends. Providers are also marketing their services to patients more now than in the past, and patients are taking control of their healthcare experience.

"We've got to make the patient in charge of their healthcare dollar," says Dr. Hochschuler. "We need to get health savings accounts on a bigger level so patients can shop for a surgeon or program based on quality, cost and outcomes."

More Articles on Spine Surgery:

24 Spine Surgeons Discuss Most Exciting Trends for the Future

11 Spine Devices Receive FDA 510(k) Clearance in January

Economics, Politics & the Independent Spine Surgeon: Q&A With Dr. Craig Callewart

6 Ways Spine Surgery Centers Can Boost Patient Satisfaction

$
0
0
Jason Jones is the senior director of customer service at Laser Spine Institute in Tampa, Fla. He has extensive experience with outpatient spine surgery centers and improving patient satisfaction.
Surgical outcomes are clearly important for centers to maintain, but patient experience can be overlooked as a major influential factor in patient referrals and loyalty, he says.

Here are Mr. Jones' six ways for spine surgery centers to increase overall patient satisfaction.

1. Communicate with patients throughout the process. As soon as a patient commits to using your ASC, reach out to him or her over the phone to "paint a clear picture of what is going to happen when they arrive," Mr. Jones says.

"Our goal is to do everything in our power to take away as much anxiety as possible," he says. "We want their focus to be on getting here and getting better."

Patients should be welcomed immediately upon arrival by a receptionist or designated greeter. The welcoming process lets patients know they are important and have arrived to a safe environment of care, he says.

Laser Spine Institute uses designated patient experience coordinators to work with individuals throughout the surgical process. The coordinators go over what to expect from the pre-operative testing through the post-operative instructions. They also go over the physical plan of the surgery center to further put patients at ease. These positive steps create a far-reaching effect.

"We try to make the experience as pleasant for them as possible,” Mr. Jones says. "That really creates so many positive ripples, not only for the patient and the healing process, but for our staff as well. We have disarmed the patient from worries they may have, which makes it much easier for them to take in information, directions or instructions they need to follow."

ASCs should strive to give the patients as much of a full scope of their procedure as possible. During transitions, explain what's next and why they may be getting an MRI or diagnostic testing, Mr. Jones says. "At every interaction we are explaining why we are doing something and what's next. They are not left guessing," he says.

2. Pick the right support staff. Spine and surgery centers can make the mistake of hiring a hospitality or support staff without considering whether or not the members' personalities will be an optimal fit for the job.

"Keep in mind that in many ASCs the hospitality staff, not necessarily the medical staff, spends the most face-to-face time with the patient," he says.

Appoint support staff who are comfortable interacting with patients and who have warm, open personalities to make the overall environment welcoming. Putting the right type of people in hospitality roles can make all the difference for patient satisfaction, he says.

3. Cater to caregivers. An often overlooked factor in overall patient satisfaction is the satisfaction of the patient's caregiver. It's important to understand the role caregivers play in the surgical experience and post-operative recovery, Mr. Jones says. He even suggests tailoring some educational brochures or handouts specifically for caregivers and issues they may face.

"We want them to feel empowered to provide the right type of care and support for the patient," he says.

A nervous caregiver can translate his or her concerns to a patient. Speaking directly to this person and letting him or her know what to expect at the facility and what may be dealt with after surgery will put all minds at ease. Make sure these people know what the day of surgery will look and feel like for them, as well as what will be available.

Speaking to the caregiver during surgery can also speed up the discharge process. "While the loved one is in surgery, we are spending time with the caregiver and explaining the discharge process," Mr. Jones says. "When they go up to discharge and get their patient, the nurse is able to direct all instruction and focus on the patient because it is the second time the caregiver is hearing the information."

4. Follow up. Laser Spine Institute contacts patients several times after surgery to check in on their progress and address any concerns. Patients receive phone calls at one week, two weeks, one month and two months, Mr. Jones says.

"We are focused on confirming what they are feeling, what they are experiencing," he says. "We ask if anything has changed since they left and if they are finding themselves being able to hit the benchmarks we talked about. We believe those first 60 days post-surgery are critical to recovery."

Time and resources should be allocated to patient follow-up, reaffirming to patients that your center cares about their success and road to recovery. Several follow ups also reaffirm to patients that they are still patients of your center after surgery has taken place and are welcome for any future needs.

"Not only are we trying to make sure they are OK clinically," he says, "but we also want to make sure they know their journey with us doesn't end when they leave our doors. We are always there for them." This helps to ensure patient loyalty to your ASC in the long run.

When patients feel comfortable, they will often contact the spine center after the follow ups have ceased for clinical questions, future physician referrals and more. Encourage those additional calls, Mr. Jones says. Ensure you are properly staffed so your medical staff can handle these additional calls, which is a critical element to long-term patient satisfaction. All of our efforts during the in-person experience can be forgotten quickly if our post-operative follow up does not match the same level of service.

5. Take feedback seriously. Rather than waiting months for any customer feedback, allow patients to give suggestions and recommendations in real time. Providing points throughout their experience for patients to give comments, in addition to asking for feedback after the fact, will help your center implement positive changes more quickly.

"We work hard to build trust with patients so that we can check in with them and ask about their experience. If they are unhappy, we capture that in real time, rather than two months down the road," he says.

Take patient comments and satisfaction seriously and truly make the changes they bring to your attention. Also, strive to build an atmosphere of understanding and trust, where patients feel welcome to give honest feedback and voice concerns.

Patient satisfaction scores and feedback should be important at all levels of leadership within your center. All personnel should be focused on constantly improving the patient experience, he says. Patient satisfaction is vital to the overall success of an organization.

Have daily or weekly strategy meetings with your center's leadership to get updates on patient satisfaction and pinpoint where service can be improved. "If we see trends in a week, it's not uncommon to break into a meeting within 24 hours to develop a strategy to attack those trends," Mr. Jones says.

6. Only work with likeminded third parties. Only work with outside companies that are prepared to match the level of care and attention given at your spine center, Mr. Jones says. If a patient needs a pre-surgical test administered at an outside clinic, then the surgery center should ensure their patient will experience the same level of patient service there as they would at your surgery center.

"Many times leaders forget we are still being judged on the patient experience they had in those other facilities," he says. "We choose our partners very carefully."

Partner with facilities whose service level and values matches that of your own. Ensuring these outside providers are still catering to your patients' needs provides peace of mind for your practice, as well as an additional level of care patients may not experience elsewhere.  

More Articles on Spine:
5 Strategies for Success With Independent Spine Practices
Dr. Michael Graham First in Texas to Perform Surgery With Secure-C Artificial Disc
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Awards First Blue Distinction for Spine Specialty Care

Sierra Neurosurgery and Nevada Neurosurgery Merge

$
0
0
Nevada Neurosurgery, founded by Lali Sekhon, MD, PhD, FACS in 2010, merged with Sierra Neurosurgery Group on February 1.
Dr. Sekhon, a spine neurosurgeon with over 20 years of experience, will join with nine neurosurgeons at Sierra Neurosurgery Group, based in Reno, Nev.

Sierra Neurosurgery Group serves Northern California and Nevada.

More Articles on Spine:
6 Ways Spine Surgery Centers Can Boost Patient Satisfaction
5 Strategies for Success With Independent Spine Practices
Texas Spine & Joint Hospital Unveils $27M Expansion, Renovation


Viewing all 23847 articles
Browse latest View live