Quantcast
Channel: Becker's Spine Review
Viewing all 23847 articles
Browse latest View live

Anna Jaques Hospital Names Dr. Simon Faynzilberg Medical Director of Pain Center

$
0
0
Anna Jaques Hospital in Newburyport, Mass., has announced that Simon Faynzilberg, MD, will be the medical director of its comprehensive pain center, according to a Newburyport Daily News report.

Dr. Faynzilberg is a fellowship-trained and board-certified pain management specialist and anesthesiologist. Dr. Faynzilberg received his medical degree in Russia and completed his residency in anesthesia at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Harvard Medical School in Boston.

The pain center now also offers a full-range of interventional and comprehensive medical management services for patients with chronic pain.

More Articles on Pain Management:

Ameritox Leadership Addresses Capitol Hill on Importance of Pain Medicine Monitoring
Study: Physicians Feel Relief When Providing Pain Relief
Indiana Town May Place Moratorium on Pain Clinics


Spine Patient Data Gathering of the Future: Q&A With Drs. Anthony Asher and Matthew McGirt of N2QOD

$
0
0
The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD) is the first nationwide effort to collect data on safety, quality and cost-effectiveness in neurosurgery. The database was launched by the NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA), which was established by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) in 2008. NPA is also supported by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, American Board of Neurological Surgery, Society of Neurological Surgeons and AANS/CNS Joint Section on Spine & Peripheral Nerves.

N2QOD was formally launched in February 2012 and currently has 31 sites under contract. About 500 patients per month are enrolled from 46 hospitals in 24 states. Here, Vice President of the NPA Board of Directors and Director of N2QOD Anthony Asher, MD, FAANS, FACS; and Vice Director of N2QOD Matthew McGirt, MD, discuss the database and how to leverage spine surgery data collection for success in the future.

Q: There are several modes of data collection available today. How is N2QOD different from the current methods of data collection in other databases or registries across the country?


Dr. Anthony Asher on spine surgeryDr. Anthony Asher:
The N2QOD is the most comprehensive data instrument yet created for widespread use in the evaluation of spine care outcomes, cost-effectiveness and safety. The N2QOD is designed to allow any surgeon, practice group or hospital to contribute to and access quality and outcomes data to a national registry.

Surgeons, and surgeon groups will be able to use the N2QOD to define national quality and performance measures in spine care, develop risk-adjusted national benchmarks for care, and determine the variables most likely to drive clinical outcomes. The latter feature will be particularly important in promoting informed, shared decision-making with patients. The practice level quality and efficiency data generated by N2QOD will facilitate local quality improvement efforts, support claims to public and private payors, help protect patient access to spine care and support other practice data collection requirements such as MOC. Additionally, the registry infrastructure is designed to promote essential scientific discovery in spine care. Dr. McGirt can comment on the unique patient-centered aspects of the registry and other essential features.

Dr. Matthew McGirt:
Most quality reporting platforms are confined to the measurement of surgical safety. N2QOD measures both the safety and the effectiveness of care. Value of healthcare interventions cannot be assessed without measurement of effectiveness of care. Among the many features that are unique to N2QOD is its focus on quality of life measures. N2QOD as a registry platform places the patient first, and defines quality of surgical care primarily by patient-Dr. Matthew McGirt on spine surgeryreported measures of pain, disability, quality of life, satisfaction and return to work. Most patients seek spine care due to limitation in their quality of life and pain-related disability. Hence, it is vital to measure effectiveness of care focusing on these patient-centered domains of health.

Secondly, N2QOD's robust risk adjustment lies at the heart of its accuracy as a quality-measurement platform. Many factors contribute to variation in outcome, and variation in the safety and effectiveness of care only contributes to part of the story. Without accurately measuring the disease-specific risk factors that influence outcome, a registry cannot adjust for the variation between surgeons' and hospitals' patient populations in order to draw meaningful conclusions on quality of care.

Current quality-measurement platforms utilize broad, non-disease-specific variables that have no bearing on spine outcomes in an attempt to risk adjust. Use of those risk-adjustment models that are not validated in spine disease cannot decipher the signal from the noise. N2QOD uses 30 spine-specific clinical variables to adjust for all of the confounding factors that effect outcome, so N2QOD can accurately identify the treatment options of highest safety, effectiveness and value. Surgeons and hospitals that take on higher-risk patients and disease will not be unfairly profiled as they are in emerging public profiling platforms.

Q: How are most hospitals collecting spine surgery data now and what will they need to change for future regulatory requirements?


MM:
Most hospitals rely on billing claims data in an attempt to understand simple measures of surgical complications, hospital readmissions and re-operations. However, administrative non-clinical data has been shown to have a high error rate and offers very little information on the details of patients or their disease. The advantage of this approach has historically been that it was the only feasible way to obtain health operations data in large volumes. Because there is a rush by all stakeholders to use analytics to make better decisions, administrative proxies of clinical measures are overused in today’s environment. Societies such as the AANS want to empower everyone vested in delivering spine care to utilize accurate data to inform their decision making in a meaningful way. That's why we have been developing N2QOD.

Q: All of healthcare seems to be shifting as data collection plays a more prominent role in care delivery. What factors are changing the way spine care is practiced and delivered?

AA:
Spine care is perhaps being most influenced by the rapid development of technologies, allowing for a greater spectrum of spine disorders to be successfully treated; safer, less invasive approaches to surgical pathologies; and enhanced healing after spinal procedures. As a consequence of this proliferation of technologies in conjunction with an aging population, the number and type of spine-related therapies has exploded. With the rapid expansion has come a dramatic increase in the overall cost of spine-related healthcare.

These costs have become a focus of attention and analysis for a variety of powerful healthcare stakeholders, including large purchasers of care, patient groups and private payors. This dynamic is fueling the demand for objective data that supports the value and safety of spine care.

Q: With all the changes in healthcare coming forward, how will providers use this data in the future?


MM:
N2QOD is especially valuable to spine providers and surgeons. N2QOD serves as a learning health system, empowering providers in their practice-based learning advancement. As spine providers and surgeons evolve in their treatment approaches, quarterly N2QOD reports will provide analytical feedback on the patient-centered effect of their treatment decisions. This will enable identification of best practices, practice-level comparative effectiveness and continual quality improvement. Many decisions on the utilization of techniques or technologies are made by the surgeon based on anecdotal experience. N2QOD analytics will allow surgeons to learn whether their decisions improve outcomes or not. N2QOD empowers evidence-based practice.

AA:
Dr. McGirt makes excellent points about the evolving role of practice data analysis in individual surgical practice. With respect to communities of surgeons, I believe successful spine practitioners in five to 10 years will be part of dynamic, collaborative networks in which multiple providers will routinely share data from their individual clinical experience to advance our common knowledge, and cooperatively improve both the safety and value of care.

Aside from advancing clinical science and facilitating practice-based learning, data collection through registries will ultimately allow spine-care specialists to satisfy a variety of external stakeholder requirements including maintenance of specialty board certification, specialty licensing, PQRS and "meaningful use."

Q: How will this database contribute to improving patient care?

MM:
This database also is designed for use with patients to help them make informed decisions. When it comes to spine care, we are hoping to facilitate a patient-centered, shared information decision-making process where the patient is empowered to see the data and play a larger role in their treatment. By measuring surgical outcomes in a wide spectrum of patients and diseases nationwide, N2QOD is able to develop more accurate statistical models that can estimate probabilities of outcome personalized to specific patients’ characteristics. This advancement in patient-decision aids will inform the patient more than ever before, and will hopefully maximize the patient satisfaction and the odds of meeting patient expectations.

AA:
I agree with Dr. McGirt's assessment. I would only add that independent of the impact of registries on patient-centered goals such as shared decision making, N2QOD and similar data-collection programs will greatly enhance the safety and value of spine care by allowing us to more objectively identify the patients most likely to benefit from specific procedures, and determine the relative effectiveness of a variety of interventions for specific disease states.

Q: Are there any challenges for data collection?


MM
: The biggest challenge registries face is collecting healthcare data across the continuum of care, from the pre-operative diagnostic episode, through the inpatient perioperative episode, to the post-operative outpatient episode. No nationwide registry effort has attempted to collect patient-reported healthcare data spanning this 12-month continuum of care. Thus far, N2QOD has been successful in our aim to do so with high data fidelity.

Q: What are your overall goals for N2QOD?


AA:
Our goal is to provide the most stable, reliable and efficient information technology system for surgeons, administrators and other healthcare stakeholders across the country to more objectively assess the value of spine care. We ultimately plan to incorporate structural changes in the registry to produce greater efficiencies and allow for integration with related information systems. In that respect, our ultimate objective is to fundamentally transform the culture of spine care by allowing individuals and groups to seamlessly integrate our platforms and methodologies into daily practice.

MM:
We want all spine-care practitioners to be able to come forward with transparent reports of their value in the broader healthcare community. As groups advertise their services and position themselves for strategic partnerships in the marketplace, they will be able to provide essential information such as rates of return to work, quality of life and patient satisfaction that are not available in most present analyses focused on administrative datasets. Participation in the N2QOD will therefore not only promote the development of quality care, but also will place participating groups in unique positions of advantage in the marketplace.

Q: How do you anticipate data collection and N2QOD will impact healthcare delivery in the future?


MM: With N2QOD, we are currently focusing and targeting orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeon practices. The data can be shared by any stakeholders, but we leave it up to participating providers as to how they can best utilize the data. We feel that N2QOD will allow for a smarter healthcare system as it relates to spine care by providing a real-world assessment of what works best, in which patients, when and how. While our primary focus right now is on improving surgical quality and defining those benchmarks for the spine provider and patient, as healthcare models change, I suspect we will offers analytics to empower hospital system decision making in the future.

AA:
I completely agree with Dr. McGirt’s assessment. Taking a broader view of the importance of routine practice data collection, I think it's important to note that information has become the global currency of the 21st century. Simply put, those who control essential data and who use this data to generate new knowledge and facilitate improvement are able to adapt, effect change, and prosper.

Collecting information from daily experience, using that information to generate new knowledge and applying that knowledge to practice improvement, self education, and other uses are activities grounded in a modern informatics society in which technical knowledge permeates all spheres of life and in which modern experts manage and produce information as their primary activity. In this regard, the systematic collection of data inseparable from clinical activities is not simply a response to abstract or irrelevant external requirements, but an opportunity to survive — and indeed thrive — amidst the increasingly competitive demands of the informatics age.

These skills will be essential for all physicians — and particularly those involved in more technical fields such as spine care — to acquire. Adopting the skills necessary to critically analyze practice, determine opportunities for improvement, and generate new knowledge will make individual spine-care physicians and the field of spine care better.

More Articles on Spine Surgeons:

24 Spine Surgeon Leaders on Why They Chose Spine Surgery

6 Ways to Slash Costs of Spine Surgery at ASCs

10 Steps for Spine Surgeons to Overcome the Fiscal Cliff


Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital Milton to Open 9,000-Square-Foot Orthopedic Center

$
0
0
Milton, Mass.-based Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital Milton announced it would soon open the new Center for Orthopaedic Care to provide both surgical and non-surgical treatment for orthopedic conditions and injuries, according to a Patriot Leger report.
The 9,000-square-foot facility includes five physicians, X-ray and MRI. Services include joint replacement surgery, sports medicine and extremities care, with the possibility of adding more specialists in the future. There are 16 private treatment room and second-phase additions include a physical therapy and rehabilitation space.

More Articles on Orthopedic Surgery:

15 Statistics Comparing Orthopedic Surgeon Compensation to Other Specialties

Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Institute Medical Centers Sponsors American Basketball League

Spine and Healthcare Reform: 3 Surgeons Weigh In

Arthritis Foundation Honors Dr. Frank Kelly With Excellence Award

$
0
0
Frank B. Kelly Jr., MD, has received the Arthritis Foundation's first Hugh C. McLeod III, MD, Award of Excellence, according to a report in AAOS Now.
Dr. Kelly is a founding partner of Forsyth Street Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Centers. He has been chair of the board for the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and received the Georgia Orthopaedic Society's Distinguished Service Award.

During his career, Dr. Kelly has served on the executive committee of the board of trustees for the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation and chair of the 20th Century Orthopaedics Society.

More Articles on Orthopedic Surgery:

15 Statistics Comparing Orthopedic Surgeon Compensation to Other Specialties

Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Institute Medical Centers Sponsors American Basketball League

Spine and Healthcare Reform: 3 Surgeons Weigh In


NFL Players Association Grants Harvard $100M in Research & Healthcare Partnership

$
0
0
The National Football League Players Association has partnered with Harvard Medical School in Boston to create an initiative to improve the health of professional football players.
The NFLPA granted $100 million to create the Harvard Integrated Program to Protect and Improve the Health of NFLPA Members with a 10-year initiative. The program will include intellectual, scientific and medical expertise for preventing and treating injuries and illness in active and retired players.

The group will immediately began working with NFL players and retired athletes on studies.

More Articles on Orthopedic Surgery:

15 Statistics Comparing Orthopedic Surgeon Compensation to Other Specialties

Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Institute Medical Centers Sponsors American Basketball League

Spine and Healthcare Reform: 3 Surgeons Weigh In


Health Reform in 2013: What's Happened, What's Left & What it Means for Providers

$
0
0
With just one year remaining before the largest parts of the federal health reform law take effect, 2013 will be a busy year for hospitals as they prepare for the biggest changes in healthcare since Medicare was introduced in 1965.
The Obama administration has embarked on a comprehensive overhaul of the way Americans deliver and pay for healthcare, aiming to make care more affordable through eliminating waste, incentivizing efficiency and requiring more recipients to pay in. It plans to achieve those goals at the cost of the traditional funding mechanisms and levels that providers have come to rely on, which could spell disaster for the unprepared.

Being prepared requires providers to not only know and adapt to what’s coming, but also to be able to explain what has changed to their patients and business partners. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act represents enormous upheaval to the healthcare industry's status quo, so here is a recap of what's happened, what's to come, and what hospitals should be doing to ready themselves for the PPACA.

Reform so far

President Barack Obama signed the PPACA into law March 23, 2010, but the lead-up to its passing was a hard fought battle. There were rumors of "death panels" enabling government-sponsored euthanasia resulting from rationed funding for healthcare. A public health insurance option intended to compete with private insurers was rejected twice. And although the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the law's contentious individual health insurance mandate in June 2012, it struck down the requirement for all states to expand their Medicaid programs, relegating that part of the law as optional for each state.

Much of the law so far has begun to turn the wheels of the health industry in the direction of growing primary care, promoting and protecting consumers' access to coverage and introducing funding models that share payors' risk and gains with providers.

2010 — Expanding access to more people, the 2010 law immediately began to disburse tax credits for small businesses' health plans and rebates to seniors for prescription drugs. Children could no longer be denied coverage due to pre-existing conditions, and some state and federal insurance plans were created for adults with pre-existing conditions who had been uninsured for six months or more. Young adults under 26 not offered insurance from their employer were permitted to stay on their parent's plan.  Anticipating the boost in demand, education assistance was established to attract more primary care nurses and physicians into underserved areas.

Within the health plans themselves, types of preventive care became covered without charging a copay or deductible, and no lifetime limits on hospital stays or other essential benefits can be imposed. More assistance is given to seniors buying Medicare Part D-covered drugs and receiving preventive services, and at the same time the Obama administration added defenses against corruption and unreasonable business practices. Extra funding was pumped into fraud-busting programs to cut unlawful billing of Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP, and into state groups with authority to review or regulate insurance premium increases.

2011 — In 2011, a major limit on insurance companies was imposed that required them to spend at least 80 to 85 percent of premium dollars on healthcare or quality improvement, rather than administrative costs or profits, or else send rebates to customers. Gradual reductions to insurance companies in the Medicare Advantage program began, slowly shrinking the $1,000 bonus paid per beneficiary on average compared with traditional Medicare.

Elderly and disabled beneficiaries gained a wealth of new services designed to decrease the amount of time they spent hospitalized, free preventive care for certain services, assistance designing care plans and coordinating support services when they were discharged from a hospital visit, and freedom for states to use Medicaid funding to pay for cheaper at-home care versus nursing home admittance. Medicare beneficiaries also began to receive a 50 percent discount on Part D-covered brand-name prescription drugs.

Money was granted to public health programs and services to help Americans purchase sensible private insurance. Efforts to build and renovate community health centers gained new financial support, and payments for rural providers went up.

2012 — Last year saw a swath of changes including the advent of accountable care organizations established in order to design cost effective approaches to care delivery in exchange for sharing in CMS' savings.

In October 2012, hospitals meeting certain benchmarks for electronic health records became eligible for incentive payments as part of provisions included in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act. That same month, CMS began its value-based purchasing program, which alters how much it pays hospitals through Medicare depending on its performance on various quality measures including patient satisfaction and hospital readmission rates.

2013 — Beginning this year, funding changes to Medicaid will reimburse primary physicians at Medicare rates through 2014. The federal government will also increase funding to states that craft Medicaid programs with better benefits for preventive care. And a national pilot program to promote bundled payment models has gone into effect, which would allow providers to take on risks and profit potential from efficient use of Medicare funds.

Coming soon

There's more to come from the law, especially next year in 2014.  That's when nearly all adults and children must obtain health insurance or pay a fine, which will be the greater of 1 percent of income or $95 per adult ($285 for a family) next year but will balloon to the greater of 2.5 percent of income or $695 ($2,085 per family) by 2016. Penalties for much wealthier families can grow as high as the average basic-level government-approved health plan's annual premiums. Employers of more than 50 full-time workers will need to offer minimum essential coverage or pay a fine for each eligible worker above a threshold who is not offered coverage.

Each state will have an online health insurance marketplace, referred to as an exchange, that will offer qualified private plans for individuals and small businesses, and screen customers to see if they are eligible for subsidies, tax credits or Medicaid. Enrollment for these begins in October this year, with coverage going live Jan. 1, 2014. All but a few Republican states have shunned the idea of running their own exchanges, opting instead for the federal government to take on the job. Supporters say the marketplaces increase competition and will benefit consumers, thus creating less need for government insurance programs.

One of the most hotly contested features of the PPACA, even today, began to receive funding in 2011. The Independent Payment Advisory Board, an appointed panel of healthcare experts, will be charged with making binding cost-cutting plans for Medicare payments beginning in 2015 that Congress can override only through new legislation that achieves the same level of savings. Republicans have vowed to eliminate the IPAB, and even some Democrats have raised an eyebrow at the concept.

Originally, the law intended for all states to be required to expand Medicaid to more poor and childless adults at 133 percent of federal poverty line. But when the Supreme Court nixed that mandate, the Obama administration fell back on incentivizing states to volunteer to expand Medicaid with a guaranteed three years during which the increased cost of the expansion will be covered entirely by the federal government. After that, states will only contribute 10 percent of the extra cost.

Medicare Disproportionate Shares payments, the lifeblood of some critical access and safety-net hospitals, will plummet 75 percent in October, but they’ll be offset by larger payments based on a hospital’s proportion of uninsured served and uncompensated care provided.

What hospitals can do to get ready

It's going to take strong hospital leadership to weather what could either be a windfall or a typhoon. Following is some advice from healthcare leaders and experts for how to prepare for the flood of changes and regulations.

Expect upfront costs. The law's goal is to lower healthcare costs over the long term, but in the short term, most will feel the changes in their checkbooks. Doug Fenstermaker, a former hospital CFO now serving as managing director and vice president of healthcare at Atlanta-based Warbird Consulting Partners, says he's skeptical of significant savings for providers in the near future, because the cost of implementing the law has a lot of upfront cost.

"It is hard to tell whether the PPACA will result in a lower amount of GDP being consumed by healthcare and if costs will actually decline. In the short-term, that is not at all likely, as investments in infrastructure to make it all work will skyrocket," he says.

While the law aims to improve coordination in the delivery of care and better use of ramped up technology to lower costs, the initial capital cost of that infrastructure will take time to be paid off.

Preserve margins with more savings, not more revenue. Bundled payments, Medicare Advantage and shared savings programs with CMS and private insurers can be lucrative for health systems, especially if fewer patients are uninsured. True, that may bring a flood of new patients, says Aurelio Fernandez, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Memorial Healthcare System in Hollywood, Fla., but political instability in his state and Washington alike means he's not counting on seeing revenues rise.

"I'm not basing our future on the ability of generating [additional] revenues, but on having cost-efficiency," Mr. Fernandez says.

Back in 2011, he says Memorial's leaders did a study and learned its cost structure was too high. So in 2012 he says they embarked on a cost reduction initiative that looked at contractual arrangements, staff reductions and eliminating unnecessary services through partnerships. They set a system-wide cost reduction goal of 5 percent, in excess of $75 million, by the end of their fiscal year which ends this April. So far they've reached 85 percent of that goal, even after realizing costs to implement their EHR system this year.

Track your performance. The sharp drop in Medicare Disproportionate Share funding will be a blow to systems like Dignity Health. The San Francisco-based organization's Vice President of External and Government Relations Wade Rose says since Dignity Health is among the California's largest providers of Medicare services, the cuts will be a challenging obstacle. He and his system's leaders support the law overall, but he acknowledges that expectations are quite high on providers' to fix inefficiencies that are easy to identify but difficult to improve because of changes that must be systemically implemented. "The reality on the ground can be very different than the elegant logic of the bill," Mr. Rose says.

In response, his team is gathering and analyzing copious amounts of data to learn where they can be more efficient, from speeding up imaging test results to designing a nurse's station to maximize productivity, and tracking the impact of these changes on performance.

Mr. Rose says that's why this law might be more successful than efforts of the past — he says 95 percent of the bill has to do with delivery system change, rather than mere funding changes.

Look beyond a hospital's four walls. Some of the greatest cost inefficiencies occur after elderly patients leave providers' care. Not following physicians' orders after being discharged from the hospital can lead to higher readmissions, which the health reform law now penalizes through lower reimbursement rates. As a result, many hospitals have focused much of their efforts into transitioning seniors from the hospital to the home, helping them help themselves stay healthy.

Nathan Anspach, CEO of Phoenix-based John C. Lincoln Health Network's accountable care organization says his organization's solution was to collaborate with physicians, clinicians and pharmacists within the ACO to design a systemwide formulary plan. "We see a pretty significant dollar savings," he says.

"We're all about the 5 to 60 rule — 5 percent of our members will use 60 percent of the resources of our ACO," Mr. Anspach says. He and his team have addressed that with greater attention on patients with chronic conditions like congestive heart failure and diabetes.

Keep patients satisfied. Among other metrics, hospitals have begun to see patient satisfaction account for a rise or deduction of up to 1 percent in their Medicare reimbursements. In an era where providers' margins are shrinking for a number of reasons, hospitals can hold on to what's theirs with a focus on patient experience, says Kristin Baird, a registered nurse and CEO of Baird Group, a Fort Atkinson, Wis.-based healthcare consulting firm.

"Patient satisfaction, once seen as fluffy or soft, is now an important measure that cannot and should not be ignored," Ms. Baird says. "Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys have leveled the playing field and give the consumer a voice along with other important outcomes. Healthcare organizations recognize now, more than ever, that providing good service directly impacts the bottom line. That realization has not been so clear before."

Partner to absorb risk. It's no secret that hospitals are employing more physicians, and that trend of employing or contracting with physicians is likely to continue, says Adam Powell, PhD, a health economist and president of Boston-based healthcare consulting firm Payer+Provider Syndicate in Boston.

"In 2013, I expect to see acceleration in the wave of payor-provider integration and hospital consolidation that began in 2012. The recent merger between Baylor Health Care System and Scott & White Healthcare is but one example of how integrated delivery systems are expanding by merging with hospital systems. Hospitals are increasingly being asked to own their risk, and merging with payors and integrated delivery systems provides them the know-how to do so," Dr. Powell says. "Providers are hoping that mergers will provide them with both more leverage in negotiating with payors and economies of scale that will enable them to lower their costs."

As scrutiny builds over unnecessary inpatient care, Mr. Fenstermaker says hospital systems are likely to divest specialties that aren't core to the business in favor of integrating those services with other systems. For this reason, he says he expects rural hospitals will begin to operate more like ambulatory care clinics and transfer more patients to larger hospitals' specialty centers.

The current number of primary care physicians will struggle to meet the anticipated demand brought on by the newly insured, so Mr. Fenstermaker predicts the industry will rely more heavily on physician assistants, practical nurses and technology to compensate for the physician shortage.

More Articles on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act:

17 Healthcare Niches — Observations for 2013
Unwavering Commitment to Internal Improvement Embedded in Hospitals' DNA
Sept/Oct 2012 Issue of Becker's Hospital Review

CMS Clarifies Individual Mandate's Penalties, Perks

$
0
0
HHS and the Internal Revenue Service have proposed rules on the health law's individual mandate, which clarify wider protection from the penalty tax for the uninsured and narrower eligibility for families to receive insurance subsidies.
Individuals who would have to pay more than 9.5 percent of their income for their employer-sponsored individual health plan would be eligible for subsidies through the online health insurance exchanges. But the rule clarifies this only pertains to individual plans, not to family plans, which are likely to cost more.

Consumer groups have expressed concerns this could lead to families being unable to afford coverage for children and spouses and ineligible for subsidies, according to a report by The Hill.

Americans whose incomes fall below 133 percent of the federal poverty line — and who live in a state that will not expand Medicaid — are also exempt from the individual mandate's penalty.

All individuals must obtain health insurance in 2014 or pay a "shared responsibility payment," unless they are members of a protected category of individuals, including those who demonstrate certain hardships or religious opposition to the mandate. Citing a Congressional Budget Office estimate, CMS said less than 2 percent of Americans will owe the penalty.


7 Cost Cutting Strategies for Spine Surgery

$
0
0
Here are seven strategies to cut costs associated with spine surgery.

1. Analyze costs for savings opportunities. Understand where the big cost centers are for spine care so you can locate opportunities for cost reduction. Spine surgeons should be part of this process because if they don't know what the procedure costs, they can't find areas for savings.

Dr. Bryan Oh on spine surgery"The first step in cost cutting is measurement and the second step is breaking down the entire costs for the procedure from A to Z," says Bryan Oh, a neurosurgeon who focuses on spine surgery at BASIC Spine in Orange, Calif. "Once you have a sense of that you can see the opportunities for cost improvement. I think that's really important because if you don't even know where the big cost centers are, you will be taking a stab in the dark."

The biggest costs associated with spine surgery are often implants, medications and 30-day readmission rates. Collect the DRT data for each spine center surgeon and discuss the variance.

"They have to engage the surgeons to see how much the procedures cost," says Dr. Oh. "Once the surgeon has a handle on the data, start lowering that rate. Demonstrate you can lower the rate and present that data to insurance companies, which will really make you a preferred provider."

2. Renegotiate instrument and implant costs.
Instrumentation and implants are likely the biggest cost center for a single case and there are plenty of opportunities to knock those prices down. First consider whether you need a brand new microscope or the latest implant generation; if not, you can save by continuing to use your original microscope or purchasing commoditized implants for wholesale prices.

"The first thing to realize about cost savings is that sacrifices are going to have to be made in terms of the instrumentation, haemostatic agents and other products that are our favorites," says Brian R. Gantwerker, MD, of The Craniospinal Center of Los Angeles. "We'll have to part with them or renegotiate our prices. In order to maintain quality of care at a reduced cost, we ourselves will also need to do our own cost cutting."

Dr. Brian Gantwerker on spine surgeryStreamlining the implants so everyone in the group uses the same devices will give you more power to form an exclusive agreement and negotiate prices down for individual implants. More hospitals now are partnering with surgeons to help them during vendor contract negotiations.

"If we are going to do a fusion, pedicle screw case or especially biologics, surgeons have to very aggressively be involved in contract and price negotiations for the product," says Dr. Gantwerker. "I was working with a hospital in Southern California and did negotiations for their microscope and operating room table, and I was able to work down the price by working with two different companies. As a surgeon, you have clout because you are bringing these devices into the operating room. Some surgeons are reticent of getting into the dirt, but for cost effectiveness it's important."

Dr. Gantwerker recommends surgeons first determine a price based on what their budget allows and then ask for 10 percent to 20 percent below that price initially. As each side negotiates to the middle, surgeons should be able to hit their target price. However, they should also be willing to walk away if necessary. "You have to picture it like buying a new car and be willing to leave," says Dr. Gantwerker. "Ninety percent of the time they will be back with a better price; however being willing to cut your losses in case they do not is extremely important."

3. Optimize efficiency in the operating room.
While minimally invasive surgery has many benefits for appropriate patients, in some cases it may be quicker to perform open procedures. Figure out how to maximize operating room time and you'll be able to lower cost per case because patients will need less anesthesia and you'll lower the risk of infection.

"You want to use your operating room time more efficiently," says Dr. Gantwerker. "Sometimes doing an open operation is faster than microscopic or endoscopic operations. Another technique is to use two surgeons on every surgery because it might be more cost-effective; the surgery is done faster and you have two sets of eyes looking at the films so you can get the patient out of the OR quicker. A big factor in cost is the time spent in the OR."

Consider whether there are process or protocol changes you can make to make better use of the time in the operating room as well as speed the transition time between patients.

4. Develop treatment protocol.
Everyone within the spine center should understand treatment protocol to provide the best care and optimize resources for patients. Not every patient will need surgery and providing the appropriate care for patients can go a long way toward lowering the overall costs for episodes of care.

"It seems like it's obvious, but if the appropriate care is rendered to the patient, there will be no complications and the cost will be less," says Dr. Oh. "If a fusion is needed, that's going to drive up the cost of care. However, if there are other treatment options you can provide well for the patient that will drive costs down."

If patients don't need surgery, make sure they are directed to the best specialist for their care so they aren't bouncing from one to the next without ever receiving effective treatment.

"This is easier to track with electronic medical records because anyone who touches the patient will log their interaction," says Dr. Oh. "You can see who did the surgery, intake and follow up. If the patient comes in with a practice or HMO, you can see how much their care costs by provider and who is providing the best care at the most reasonable rates. "

5. Take steps to reduce readmissions.
The overall cost of care includes 30-day readmissions, which bump up costs significantly. Collect data on readmission rates and figure out how to avoid them in the future.

"Many of the high costs come from an excessive length of stay or repeat readmissions from a single patient," says Dr. Oh. "Those are huge cost generators. You can see it as a trend in a specific hospital or surgeon group. I think once some of that data becomes available, surgeons will be able to compare themselves within their peer groups and national data so they can make improvements."

Reduce readmissions by focusing on new protocols to eliminate the problem, such as hospital-acquired infections, complications or postoperative pain management. Work with the nurses and other specialists at the hospital to lower these rates. Pay extra attention to patients who are at high risk of readmissions — such as older patients — to ensure they have everything they need before leaving the hospital.

"In the future, insurance companies will see the outliers who have higher readmissions, and those individuals or hospitals won't get good contracts," says Dr. Oh.

6. Cut down on disposables.
There are some devices and systems that use a high volume of disposables, which significantly increases the cost per case. Pay attention to the supplies such as bipolars and dural grafting material that are disposable but extremely expensive.

"There are certain retractor systems with disposable pieces that drive up costs," says Dr. Gantwerker. "Push more toward using a reusable package that is just as effective. That should be one of the top priorities to cut costs."

When surgeons are actively working with hospitals to cut their costs, especially if their work includes materials changes and vendor negotiations, they can add a consulting agreement to their relationship. "Nobody in this country works for free," says Dr. Gantwerker. "We are entitled to charge for our time if we are doing that service to the hospital, and we can be compensated for it at a reasonable rate."

7. Make big purchases smartly.
Just because you are trying to cut costs doesn't mean that spending more upfront is always a bad idea. Capital purchases come at a big expense and you want to put quality first, especially if you could realize a cost savings later.

"Part of cost savings is spending money in the right place," says Dr. Gantwerker. "Maybe a more expensive microscope is better, but later the depreciation is less and the reliability actually holds. You will realize the cost benefits later down the road, when you do not need to service it for multiple reasons."

As an example, some practices may choose to purchase Apple computers at a higher initial price than Windows-based personal computers. However, there is a cost savings long-term because they won't have to spend additional money fighting viruses; replacing faulty boards and monitors and the OS X operating system is more robust than Windows or other systems.

Dr. Brian Gantwerker is a spine and neurosurgeon with The Craniospinal Center of Los Angeles. He earned his medical degree at Rush Medical College in Chicago and completed his fellowship at the Barrow Neurological Institute in spine surgery.

Dr. Bryan Oh with BASIC Spine is board certified in Neurological Surgery and received his medical training at Stanford University with a residency in neurosurgery and fellowship in spine surgery at the University of Southern California.

Dr. Oh was a faculty member at the University of Texas at Houston Medical School and was Director of Neurotrauma for the busiest Level One Trauma Center in the United States. Please follow us on facebook, google+ and twitter for updates!


More Articles on Spine Surgery:

24 Spine Surgeon Leaders on Why They Chose Spine Surgery

6 Ways to Slash Costs of Spine Surgery at ASCs

10 Steps for Spine Surgeons to Overcome the Fiscal Cliff



K7 Intervertebral Spine Fusion Device Cleared by FDA

$
0
0
K7 has received FDA 510(k) clearance for its K7C Cervical Spacer spinal implant for use as an intervertebral body fusion device.
The K7C uses VESTAKEEP PEEK material for durability. It is one of the first PEEK-based spinal fusion medical devices to gain FDA approval, according to the release.

More Articles on Spine Devices:
Medical Device Companies Use Additive Manufacturing to Cut Implant Costs
Community Regional Medical Center First to Use New Knee Replacement Device
Pioneer Surgical Technology Opens German Plant

5 Healthcare Reform Threats to Spine Surgeons & How to Overcome Them

$
0
0
Dr. Bryan Oh on spine surgery and healthcare reformBig changes are coming in healthcare, and not all of them are positive.

"There is an understanding changes are coming from ObamaCare, and spine surgeons have to find creative strategies to solve these new issues," says Bryan Oh, MD, a neurosurgeon who focuses on spine surgery with BASIC Spine in Orange, Calif. "There might be ideas that they hadn't thought of in the past and having the framework to present these strategies to carriers as well as execute them successfully would benefit spine surgeons going forward."

Here are five threats to spine care and how surgeons can effectively overcome them.

1. Transition to pay for performance.
The traditional fee-for-service model is changing to compensate more for quality than quantity. Spine surgeons aren't paid as well today as they were a few years ago for the same amount of work as each unit of work receives smaller payment.

"If you want to keep the same level of income, you have to work harder," says Dr. Oh. "The other part of pay for performance is that if there are complications, you'll be paid less than if the case went perfectly. This hasn't happened yet but it's coming in the future."

Even if the complication isn't directly attributable to the surgeon, insurance reimbursement will still take a hit. Spine surgeons will heighten oversight on all aspects of patient care to ensure full compensation.

"Surgeons may have to become an overall better 'doctor' by making sure everyone from the internist to the anesthesiologist to the rehabilitation specialist is doing the right thing," says Dr. Oh. "They'll take on a leadership role in taking care of the patient."

2. Medicare payment cuts.
Even though the 27.5 percent reduction in Medicare payment to physicians was once again avoided at the beginning of this year, spine surgeons should expect to see cuts in the near future.

"There is always a threat that Medicare payments are going to get cut, especially with upcoming budget talks," says Dr. Oh. "When Medicare is cut, everything else will be cut because private insurers base their rates on the Medicare fee schedule. This hasn't happened yet, but it's out there."

Without knowing for sure when or how Medicare reimbursement will be cut, specialists will be forced to delay big purchases and other growth plans until they understand how their practice will be impacted. In the meantime, surgeons can seek other revenue and compensation opportunities, such as ancillary services.

3. Bundling codes.
Insurance companies are now bundling codes to squeeze less reimbursement into larger overall payment for services. This can have a big impact on a spine surgeon's bottom line.

"Now CPT codes are getting bundled and again we are paid less for the same amount of work," says Dr. Oh. "We'll need to bring more cases into the practice and surgery center. I think having a good physician extender is going to be key in the future."

If spine surgeons aren't routinely running more than one operating room at one time, the PA can open and close the cases. This allows surgeons to work the same number of hours but see increased patient flow.

"Obviously spine surgeons still need to be mindful of not cutting corners in the OR and have the same attention to detail as in the past," says Dr. Oh. "But this strategy should allow for increased efficiency and revenue."

4. Reimbursement decline.
As payment from all payor sources continues to decrease, and the cost of keeping a practice open increases, physician groups have the opportunity to capture ancillary income. Ancillary services can add revenue flow to the practice and improve the bottom line.

"Imaging is one service many spine practices can bring in, although they are more tightly regulated today," says Dr. Oh. "Providing a physical therapy component to your spine program or partnering with a hospital to provide call are other opportunities for spine surgeons."

Make sure you understand local and national regulatory requirements for adding new services or contracting with the hospital.

"There are some gray areas, but I think in a very careful setting there are good options for generating ancillary income legally," says Dr. Oh. "Some physicians have looked at ancillary revenue streams negatively in the past, but these services can add value to the practice as well. Spine surgeons have to demonstrate how ancillary services enhance patient care by better communication between specialists, easier scheduling and less travel and waiting time for patients."

5. Accountable care organizations and global payments.
New payment models such as accountable care organizations and bundled payments are forcing providers to take more risk for patient care than in the past. Insurance companies are passing the risk by negotiating a single pay rate for global coverage, including conservative care, spine surgery and postoperative rehabilitation.

"Our practice has spine surgeons, physical medicine and rehabilitation, physiatry, pain management, pain psychology and chiropractic care," says Dr. Oh. "This is the beginning of a spine care ACO model. In the future we could go to big carriers and offer to handle all spine care for their customers. We haven't executed any contracts yet, but they are in the works."

Under these agreements, if there were complications insurance companies wouldn't pay more to cover them. "However, if the providers execute quality care, they can actually stand to increase their revenue," says Dr. Oh.

Dr. Bryan Oh is board certified in Neurological Surgery and received his medical training at Stanford University with a residency in neurosurgery and fellowship in spine surgery at  the University of Southern California. Dr. Oh was a faculty member at the University of Texas at Houston Medical School and was Director of Neurotrauma for the busiest Level One Trauma Center in the United States. He is a reviewer for the journals Neurosurgery and World Neurosurgery as well as a member of several prestigious societies, including the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons.

Please follow Dr. Oh and BASIC  on facebook, google+ and twitter for more spine practice updates.


More Articles on Spine Surgery:

24 Spine Surgeon Leaders on Why They Chose Spine Surgery

6 Ways to Slash Costs of Spine Surgery at ASCs

10 Steps for Spine Surgeons to Overcome the Fiscal Cliff

Using Bundled Payments in Orthopedics to Begin Developing a Center of Excellence

$
0
0
Bundled payments are part of new reimbursement models under healthcare reform that pay a lump sum to healthcare providers who share the risks and benefits of care delivery for a particular procedure or condition. Much of the discussion on bundled payments has focused on benefits from improving quality and lowering costs. However, there are other opportunities that bundled payments present, particularly for hospital orthopedic programs, according to Djamel Bayliche, vice president at Corazon, a national consulting firm for healthcare service lines.
Djamel Bayliche is vice president at Corazon, a national consulting firm for healthcare service lines. The basis of a center of excellence
Achieving shared savings under a bundled payment model requires healthcare providers work together to standardize care, improve quality and increase efficiency. By standardizing care, providers can not only increase predictability, but can also improve care and create a better patient experience. These four attributes — quality care, teamwork between the hospital and physicians, patient experience and process efficiency — are the fundamental building blocks of a center of excellence, Mr. Bayliche says. He calls this framework "QP3," an easy term to remember for quality care, physician relations, patient experience and process efficiency.

A collaborative relationship between hospital administration and physicians enables the team to improve quality, patient experience and efficiency, which distinguishes an orthopedic center of excellence from a typical orthopedic program, according to Mr. Bayliche. "Most hospitals can perform a knee or hip replacement surgery. What differentiates one program from another is quality, consistency of care and the patient experience," he says. "Bundled payments can be a catalyst to creating the necessary change in hospital orthopedic programs."

Quality outcomes: Improving patient outcomes
Since a significant portion of the savings under bundled payments will come from efficiencies gained through consistent processes, bundled payments create an opportunity to incentivize physicians and other providers to work together to standardize care, Mr. Bayliche says.

Consistent processes can enhance the quality of care and improve outcomes. "If you perform tasks with consistency, you have a better chance of controlling quality," Mr. Bayliche says. For example, creating standard protocols for orthopedic surgery ensures every provider knows what to expect for each step of the process, thus reducing the likelihood of missing important steps in the process. These steps can range from properly identifying the patient and marking the site for surgery to making a wheelchair available when the patient is ready to leave the hospital.

Improving quality makes care safer and attracts more patients to the hospital, which can add the case volume necessary to move the hospital closer on the path to a center of excellence.

Physician relations: Collaboration fosters improvement
The bundled payment structure of a lump sum payment and shared savings provides an incentive for physicians and non-physicians in a hospital to work together. "Bundled payments can create an environment for hospitals to connect with their surgeons in meaningful ways because they provide an opportunity to have aligned goals, where everybody is on the same team with a common vision," Mr. Bayliche says.

The bundled payment model can also help engage other providers on the orthopedic team, such as rehab specialists, anesthesiologists and physician assistants. A multidisciplinary team with a shared goal is a staple of centers of excellence, as they ensure all needs of a patient are met by the various providers and that care is coordinated across the full continuum.

Patient experience: Treating patients like guests
Bundled payments can also help providers improve patient experience through standardization. As providers standardize their practices, patients' visits become more predictable and therefore comfortable, because patients know what to expect. Consistent processes also reduce duplication, creating a streamlined experience for patients (e.g., not asking the patient the same questions multiple times).

Mr. Bayliche says hospitals can improve patient experience in orthopedics by treating patients as guests rather than sick individuals. "Most orthopedic patients are well individuals with a musculoskeletal problem," he says.  He suggests creating a healthy environment with hotel/resort-like amenities (e.g., street clothes and room service menus) to help alleviate patient anxiety and improve care. The improved patient experience moves the hospital's orthopedic program a step closer to becoming a center of excellence.  

Process efficiency: Standardization speeds processes, lowers costs

Standards that are developed under a bundled payment model also improve process efficiency. For example, Mr. Bayliche says a proficient orthopedic surgeon should be able to perform a particular procedure, such as a knee replacement, in a consistent sequence of steps with consistent staff and other support resources. This consistency creates more consistency in scheduling and more efficiency in throughput with minimal delays, leading to cost savings and the ability for the surgeon to perform more cases.

Another area where bundled payments can drive standard processes in orthopedics is in the use of implantable devices. "Now the surgeon, hospital and other players are on the same team; they're in a better negotiating position when talking to vendors, specifically implant vendors," Mr. Bayliche says. Everyone on the orthopedics team is motivated to improve staff skills, lower costs and share in additional savings by establishing standards for implant use. By agreeing to a standard set of vendors and types of implants for a certain procedure, the team can benefit from economies of scale and receive larger discounts from vendors.

In addition to cost savings, standardizing implants can improve efficiency and quality of care. Clinicians and staff who perform sterilization would not have to manage multiple types of implants, most of which may have different manufacturing guidelines for setup, use and cleaning. Implant standardization would thus reduce the amount of staff training needed, Mr. Bayliche says.

Bundled payments open the door to improving care efficiency and consistency, and create an environment for hospital orthopedic programs to move further along the path to a center of excellence.

More Articles on Hospital Orthopedics:

Harris Medical Center Orthopedic Hospital to Open September 2013
Putting Together an Orthopedic Outcomes Registry: One Health System's Approach

Two SSM Health Care Hospitals Accepted Into CMS Bundled Payment Pilot

5 Spine Surgeons on Operating Room Innovation

$
0
0
Five spine surgeons discuss what types of innovation they would like to see in the operating room in the next five years.
Ask Spine Surgeons is a weekly series of questions posed to spine surgeons around the country about clinical, business and policy issues affecting spine care. We invite all spine surgeon and specialist responses. Next week's question: On what topic would you like to see more spine research focused?

Please send responses to Heather Linder at hlinder@beckershealthcare.com by Wednesday, Feb. 13, at 5 p.m. CST.


Vincent Arlet, MD, Orthopedic Spine Surgeon, KneeFootAnkle Center of Kirkland (Wash.): Imaging technologies; neurophysiology improvement with more sensitivity than what we have, even though the improvements have been already spectacular; new technologies that will avoid, prevent or decease the junctional syndromes in spinal deformities and degenerative spine

Ara Deukmedjian, MD, Neurosurgeon and CEO, Deuk Spine Institute, Melbourne, Fla.: [I would like to see] widespread acceptance of endoscopic spinal disc repair as a replacement for fusion. Deuk Laser Disc Repair is the newest, most advanced minimally invasive, full endoscopic surgery for repairing symptomatic damaged spinal discs. I believe endoscopic cervical Deuk Laser Disc Repair will become the treatment of choice worldwide for most symptomatic herniated or bulging discs causing neck or arm pain, radicular symptoms and cervicogenic headaches. Right now, patients suffering with these symptoms usually receive open surgery and spinal implants, usually fusion with plates and screws and bone graft. Arthroscopic spine surgery is the future treatment of choice for disc herniations and stenosis with pain, and this procedure has a 95 percent success rate for resolving pain with no complications to date. The entire surgery is performed through a 4 millimeter skin incision or as wide as the letters on this screen are tall.

Jeffrey Wang, MD, UCLA Spine Center: I would like to see more practical technology in the OR in the next five years — easier ways to account for sponges and items used in the OR using electronic monitoring; more detailed interactions between the surgical team, anesthesia and the nursing staff; a team-building atmosphere in the actual operating room; better ways to access and view our imaging systems, X-rays and more detailed digital imaging in the OR that will make the process of the operation easier, more automated and better for our patients; perhaps an integration of our imaging systems with our microscopes and imaging screens during the surgery. I think there are practical technologies that can benefit everyone.

William Taylor, MD, Spine Surgeon, UC San Diego Health System: The promise of navigation has yet to be realized in many operating rooms throughout the country. Navigation and its related field of neural monitoring in conjunction with available technology would allow tremendous advances in patient safety, operative speed and complication reduction. Unfortunately, this technology remains expensive, occasionally cumbersome and slow adoption remains the norm. I feel strongly that the operating room of the future will have neuronavigation and neural monitoring as a primary focus to reduce complications and improve patient outcome.

Jeffrey Goldstein, MD, Director of Spine Service, NYU Langone Medical Center's Hospital for Joint Diseases: I would like to see biologics with efficacy proven with level I data which are affordable with minimized side effects. This may include advances in stem cells which act to regenerate injured or degenerative discs in addition to bone graft substitutes. With respect to fusion devices, we have implant surface technology available which can program bony in-growth and enhance fusion. As we become more aware of the need to restore sagittal balance, we will also have implants available which can restore spinal alignment. Motion preservation procedures will evolve to the next step with implants which are more compatible with MRI and allow better imaging in the cervical spine.

More Articles on Spine:
5 Healthcare Reform Threats to Spine Surgeons & How to Overcome Them
Dr. Christopher Duma to Provide Parkinson's Treatment at DISC Sports & Spine
Drs. John Liu, Frank Acosta Join USC's Keck Medical Center


7 Things for Spine Surgeons to Know for Thursday

$
0
0
Here are seven things for spinal surgeons to know for February 7, 2013.
1. Cervical spine costs up
Researchers have discovered a possible link between rising cervical spine surgery costs and older patients. The National Inpatient Sample Hospital Cost and Utilization Project database showed cervical spine surgeries increased by 64,000 between 2002 and 2009, and the average age of patients increased from 56.4 years to 58 years. The average cost per patient increased by $4,531, a rise which may be due to an older patient population, according to the report.

2. Medicare & Medicaid spending is slowing
Healthcare spending on Medicare and Medicaid has grown slower than many have predicted, and the most recent report shows federal spending for the two programs was 5 percent lower than it estimated in March 2010. Seven-year spending projections for Medicare and Medicaid in 2020 were lowered by $200 billion — $126 billion for Medicare and $78 billion for Medicaid, which is roughly a 15 percent decrease for each program.

3. Spine fusion device cleared by FDA
K7 received FDA 510(k) clearance for its K7C Cervical Spacer spinal implant for use as an intervertebral body fusion device. The K7C uses VESTAKEEP PEEK material for durability. It is one of the first PEEK-based spinal fusion medical devices to gain FDA approval.

4. The University of Southern California recruits spine surgeon leaders
The University of Southern California recruited two spine surgeons from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center to help expand the spine center at Keck Medical Center. John Liu, MD, and Frank Acosta, MD, will help expand the multi-disciplinary, academic-based spine center and will join other neurological and orthopedic spine surgeons in seeing patients.

5. Zimmer to pay for patent infringement
Zimmer Holdings was told to pay $70 million to Stryker for patent infringements by a federal jury in Grand Rapids, Mich., which found that Zimmer willfully infringed on patents for devices that use pulsing liquid to clean bones during joint replacement surgery. Zimmer plans to appeal the verdict.

6. Legislation could close a Medicare loophole
Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and Tom Coburn, MD (R-Okla.), have introduced a bill that would sunset Section 3141 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — a controversial provision that sets the Medicare hospital wage index floor for the entire country. Under Section 3141, the Medicare hospital wage index is adjusted so that a state's urban hospitals must be reimbursed for wages paid to physicians and staff at least as much as rural hospitals. These reimbursements for hospital wages also come from a national pool of money, meaning that if one state receives higher Medicare wages, it will come at the expense of another state.

7. Parkinson's Disease relief at DISC Sports and Spine
Christopher Duma, MD, will perform his Deep Brain Stimulation implantation for Parkinson's Disease treatment at DISC Surgery Center in Newport Beach, Calif.
DBS is designed as an outpatient way to control tremors and has a record of minimal side effects.

More Articles on Spine:
Drs. John Liu, Frank Acosta Join USC's Keck Medical Center
The Business of Spine to Host Spine Coding, Revenue Cycle Course
7 Cost Cutting Strategies for Spine Surgery



Minnesota Vikings' John Sullivan Undergoes Knee Surgery at Andrews Institute

$
0
0
Surgeons at Andrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine in Pensacola, Fla., performed knee surgery on Minnesota Vikings Center John Sullivan, according to a CBS Sports report.
Surgeons performed microfracture surgery on Mr. Sullivan to remove loose cartilage from an exposed bone, according to the report. Mr. Sullivan is expected to spend three to four months recovering from the procedure.

More Articles on Sports Medicine:

NFL Players Association Grants Harvard $100M in Research & Healthcare Partnership

9 Orthopedic Surgeries for Professional Athletes

Missouri Sports Hall of Fame to Induct Chris Leslie


Dr. William Sterett to Perform Knee Surgery on Olympic Skier Lindsey Vonn

$
0
0
US Ski team physician William Sterett, MD, will perform knee surgery on Olympic skier Lindsey Vonn, according to a report in the New York Times.
Ms. Vonn injured her knee during the world champion super-G race earlier this week and will have surgery to repair a tear in her anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments. She also sustained a tibial fracture, according to the report.

Dr. Sterett may be able to perform the procedure next week.

More Articles on Sports Medicine:

NFL Players Association Grants Harvard $100M in Research & Healthcare Partnership

9 Orthopedic Surgeries for Professional Athletes

Missouri Sports Hall of Fame to Induct Chris Leslie



25 Orthopedic & Spine Devices Receive FDA 510(k) Clearance in January

$
0
0
The Food and Drug Administration granted 25 orthopedic- and spine-related device clearances in January.
1. Instinct Java System from Zimmer Spine.

2. K7C Spacer from K7.

3. Mega 5.5 Spine System from LSK Biopartners.

4. Falcon Spacer from Synthes.

5. Aequalis Ascend Flex Shoulder System from Tornier.

6. Q-Fix Suture Anchor from Eleven Blade Solutions.

7. Stryker CrossFlow Arthroscopy Pump from Stryker.

8. Spinal Elements Cervical Intervertebral Body Fusion System from Spinal Elements.

9. Optetrak Logic CRC Tibial Insert from Exactech.

10. Sculptor Robotic Guidance Arm from Stanmore Implants Worldwide.

11. Caber Spine Technologies TLS 5.0 Interbody Cage from Caber Spine Technologies.

12. MTF New Bone Void Filler from Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation.

13. PowerEase System from Medtronic Sofamor Danek.

14. iTotal Cruciate Retaining Knee Replacement System from ConforMIS.

15. AccuLIF TL and PL Cage from Coalign Innovations.

16. Conventus Orthopaedics Fracture Fixation System from Conventus Orthopaedics.

17. Innesis PEEK Cage from BK Meditech.

18. Caliber Spacers from Globus Medical.

19. Geminus Fossa Specific Plate System from Skeletal Dynamics.

20. Footprint Ultra Suture Anchor from Smith & Nephew.

21. Turon Glenoid Pegged E+ from Encore Medical.

22. Medyssey Cannulated Pedicle Screw from Medyssey.

23. Smith & Nephew Screw and Plate System Instrumentation from Smith & Nephew.

24. Orthocon Absorbable Hemostatic Bone Putty from Orthocon.

25. VertiLIF-C from Wenzel Spine.

More Articles on Orthopedic Devices:

Zimmer Must Pay Stryker $70M for Patent Infringement

Pioneer Surgical Technology Opens German Plant

Medical Device Companies Use Additive Manufacturing to Cut Implant Costs


Physician Recruitment Trends: 2012 Statistics and What it Means for the Future

$
0
0
Healthcare saw some major changes in 2012, most stemming from 2010's Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, others coming from market forces and physician shortages. These changes have influenced physician recruitment across the country — both in terms of the types of physicians that hospitals and health systems are looking for and where the physicians are going.

To that end, The Medicus Firm, a Dallas-based physician search company, rounded up the top 12 specialties it placed last year and the five states with the most physicians placed in 2012. Jim Stone, president of The Medicus Firm and president-elect of the National Association of Physician Recruiters, explains what last year's statistics reveal for physician recruitment in the future.

Top specialties

The following were Medicus' 12 most placed specialties in 2012:

1. Family practice
2. Hospitalist
3. Internal medicine
4. Pediatrics
5. Neurology
6. Surgery
7. Obstetrics and gynecology
8. Orthopedic Surgery
9. Psychiatry
10. Cardiology
12. Pulmonary disease and critical care

Last year's top-placed specialties revealed two major trends in physician recruitment that are likely to continue this year.

Prevalence of primary care. The three primary care specialties — family practice, internal medicine and pediatrics — made up 36.8 percent of all of the specialties placed by The Medicus Firm last year. "The huge percentage of primary care searches is definitely something new, and we're anticipating that's going to continue," says Mr. Stone.

The focus on primary care can be attributed to hospital's and health system's increased focus on providing patient-centered, accountable care. Having the right number of high- quality primary care physicians is becoming increasingly important, because having a large primary care physician base can help build market share and manage the health of a population. Both have become focuses in the new healthcare landscape.

Increasing number of hospitalists. Hospitalists clocked in as the second-most placed specialty in 2012, making up 12.5 percent of all specialties placed by The Medicus Firm last year. "For that to be on equal footing [with primary care] was a big surprise," said Mr. Stone. The large number of placed hospitalists becomes more surprising when considering the fact that the Society for Hospital Medicine estimates there are just more than 40,000 practicing hospitalists in the country.

Mr. Stone says the demand for hospitalists is high. One reason hospitals recruit hospitalists aggressively is because it can make recruiting other physicians easier. "It makes it easier to recruit primary care physicians because [hospitals] use hospitalists for inpatient work," Mr. Stone explained. That leaves primary care physicians with a lighter workload and more time for outpatient work.

States and market types

The following are the top five states where The Medicus Firm placed physicians last year:

1. Ohio
2. Pennsylvania
3. Mississippi
4. Texas
5. California

Last year's top five states were not all that unusual, says Mr. Stone. More interesting, he says, is the market types where the physicians were placed. "We're doing more work in larger areas than what we've traditionally done," Mr. Stone says. According to The Medicus Firm, about 25 percent of physicians were placed in major metropolitan areas — that percentage is usually around 10 to 12 percent.

This trend can be attributed to the growing physician shortage. "What we're seeing is [that] physician shortages, which were in rural…areas, have come home to roost in the major cities as well," says Mr. Stone.

Historically, physicians have gravitated to metro areas, seeing them as a more desirable place to settle; meanwhile, rural and secondary markets could draw physicians in with competitive compensation. Now, that is becoming more difficult. "The shortages have gotten to the point that major metro areas are competing from a financial standpoint, which has stolen the thunder of the rural locations," Mr. Stone says. That means the future of physician recruiting in rural markets is looking bleak going into 2013.

Overall, the types of physicians being placed and where they are going are indicative of the future of healthcare. More hospitals and health systems are looking for primary care providers to spearhead population health management and are utilizing hospitalists to help with their primary care recruitment efforts. Also, the physician shortage is causing difficulties for rural and secondary market providers, and the competition for physicians is likely to grow throughout 2013.

Note: This article was updated to reflect new data from the Society For Hospital Medicine on the estimated number of hospitalists in the country.

More Articles on Physician Recruitment:

Mayo Primary Care Clinic Falls Victim to Physician Shortage, Will Close
Hospital-Physician Tool: White Paper on Physician Employment
Telemedicine Fills Physician Recruitment Gaps at Nantucket Cottage Hospital

Dr. Isador Lieberman Receives Award for Spine Mission Work

$
0
0
Spine surgeon Isador Lieberman, MD, received the Golden Apple Award from Health Volunteers Overseas for his work with the Uganda Spine Surgery Mission.
HVO created the award as a World Health Day observance to recognize contributions of volunteers. Dr. Lieberman has helped to both found and coordinate the Uganda Spine Surgery Mission, where he and other physicians provide spine care to patients in Mulago, Uganda.

He has been volunteering for seven years, and has helped fundraise for the mission, provide clinical teaching to the residents and improve spine care in Uganda.

Dr. Lieberman earned his medical degree at the University of Toronto, where he also completed an orthopedic surgery residency. He completed a spine surgery fellowship at the Toronto Hospital and Queens Medical Center in Nottingham, United Kingdom.

More Articles on Spine:
7 Things for Spine Surgeons to Know for Thursday
5 Spine Surgeons on Operating Room Innovation
5 Healthcare Reform Threats to Spine Surgeons & How to Overcome Them


Smith & Nephew Profits Up 1% in 4Q, Revenue Dips 3%

$
0
0
London-based orthopedic device developer Smith & Nephew saw a modest attributable profit increase of 1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012, from $140 million in 2011 to $142 million in 2012.
However, fourth quarter revenue dropped by nearly 3 percent from approximately $1.12 billion in 2011 to $1.1 billion in 2012. Year end attributable profit rose nearly 25 percent from $582 million to $729 million.

Smith & Nephew's revenue for surgical devices decreased by nearly 5 percent in the fourth quarter, with $797 million in 2012 compared to $835 million in 2011. Overall 2012 revenue for surgical devices also dropped 4 percent. Fourth quarter advanced wound management revenue increased by 3 percent, from $271 million to $280.

More Articles on Devices:
Stanmore Receives FDA Approval for Robotic Partial Knee Surgery
Zimmer Must Pay Stryker $70M for Patent Infringement
Victrex Looks for Market Growth in 2013


7 Tax Planning Strategies for Orthopedic Surgeons to Consider

$
0
0
Here are eight tax planning strategies for orthopedic surgeons post-Bush Tax Cuts.
1. Tax rate and deductions. The expiration of Bush Tax Cuts at the beginning of 2013 and other initiatives going into affect at the beginning of this past year have an impact on the financial situation of many orthopedic and spine surgeons. Most notably:

•    Top marginal rate for tax payers who make over $450,000 increased to 39.6 percent — a 4.5 percent increase;
•    Individuals who make over $200,000 also saw a 4.5 percent increase in their tax rate;
•    A new 3.8 percent surtax on investment income will now take affect for taxpayers with income over $250,000.

Christopher Wills on tax planning"If you combine all the new taxes that take effect in 2013, it amounts to about 10 percent of income over $450,000," says Christopher Wills, CPA, CFA, CFP,  Director of Wealth Management for R.W. Roge & Company. "In addition high income taxpayers will see deductions phased out more aggressively further adding to the tax bite."

For surgeons and surgery centers purchasing capital equipment, where they were once able to deduct the first $125,000 they are now only able to deduct the first $25,000.

"I am telling my clients that if they need a new piece of equipment to do a break-even analysis to make sure the equipment is paid for in a reasonable timeframe and that the outlay of money does not hinder operations in other areas," says Sean Weiss, vice president and chief operating officers of DoctorsManagement. "The bottom line is, if you need modern equipment and you call yourselves the pioneers in your area of the country then you need the latest equipment to do that. Medical professionals and physicians have to be smart and that means fighting off the urge to do nothing or to do too much. Right now it is all about balance."

2. Capital gains rates.
The capital gains rate will go from 15 percent to 20 percent, which has a big impact on people in the over $450,000 income earner stipulation. Surgeons typically have investments that would be impacted in their portfolios.
"Long Term Capital Gains from the sale of investments held more than a year are often a significant component of a high net worth clients' taxable income," says Mr. Wills.

However, surgeons may be able to take advantage of capital gains rates through obtaining structured notes in a number of asset classes. This allows surgeons to avoid ordinary income and instead receive long-term capital gains for the growth of these positions.

"This is a sophisticated investment strategy that we use to address the tax issue that will face our clients upon the expiration of the Bush Era tax cuts," says Thomas Balcom, CFP®, CAIA, MBA, Founder of 1650 Wealth Management in Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, Fla. "By transferring taxes at the ordinary income level to the more favorable long term capital gains rates, we have essentially provided our clients with a nice tax benefit/savings."

This is a strategy used more commonly in Europe and Asia, and comes with credit risk. Make sure the banks are strong and you are comfortable with the credit risk before implementing this strategy. For example, you would be in trouble if you invested in Lehman Brothers notes because they have gone bankrupt.

3. Estate tax exemption.
The estate tax exemption was maintained at $5 million, which is positive for high income individuals. This means the first $5 million associated with the estate is not subject to the estate tax, but everything beyond $5 million will continue to be taxed. The tax rate there grew from 35 percent to 40 percent.

"There was concern that the estate tax exemption might go back to the $1 million dollar level," says Mr. Wills. "So this is one of the few positives that came out of the new legislation."

Benjamin Sullivan on tax planningThe strategies for minimizing the impact of future estate taxes don't have to be complex, and surgeons should also think about portability after their death. Married couples who are worth significantly more than $1 million should have a "credit-shelter trust" provision in their wills so each person's $1 million estate tax exemption will be fully preserved, says Benjamin C. Sullivan, a certified financial planner with Palisades Hudson Financial Group.

"Whether the estate and gift tax is a new challenge for you or an ongoing part of your financial planning, it's important to create a plan that works for you no matter what," says Mr. Sullivan. "Build in flexibility to deal with any future changes Congress may throw your way."

4. Payroll tax.
Physician practices responsible for their employee payroll will be hit with a 2 percent increase in payroll tax. This impacts every business in the country, as the rate was bumped from 4.2 percent to 6.2 percent.

"Physicians are in the middle of a 'perfect storm' related to our fiscal problems," says Mr. Wills. "They are getting hit on both the tax side and income side from the Affordable Care Act."

Their income from reimbursements is under pressure and their tax burden has increased.

Dr. Brian Gantwerker on tax planning"It doesn't sound like a lot, but that's taking about $120 billion out of the economy, and people will have less to spend," says Brian R. Gantwerker, MD, of The Craniospinal Center of Los Angeles. "Things will get tighter if a debt ceiling deal is not reached and we should prepare for that. We can prepare by coordinating care with patients, and getting needed surgeries before this hits and having a contingency plan in your practice for cost cutting, employee hour cuts and lease renegotiations. The sky isn't falling yet, but we should prepare like it's going to."
5. Tax exempt bonds. Surgeons can minimize the impact of the increased taxes by investing in tax-exempt bonds. However, the increased value of these bonds among high income tax payers has driven yields down.

"There are still opportunities for using tax exempt bonds to avoid all of the new tax increases since they aren't subject to either federal income or the new 3.8 percent investment income surtax," says Mr. Wills. "But this was anticipated last year and we have seen a rally in the municipal bond market. That reduces the effective yield these bonds provide. However, there are still opportunities to identify good bonds that provide better after-tax returns than taxable bonds."

6. Consider growth vs. dividend paying stocks.
Stocks that pay dividends are popular today because they are viewed as a safe harbor; a high quality blue chip investment. However, these investments are subject to the investment surtax so surgeons should consider adding more growth orientation to their portfolio.

"Investments with a growth orientation do not trigger a tax liability until sold," says Mr. Wills. "This allows you to control the timing of the income and trigger those gains when you want."

7. Installment sales.
Physicians aren't typically involved in installment sales, but some may be able to benefit from them in the future. "If you have an arrangement selling the practice, consider installment sales because that can defer the taxable income over a number of years and potentially lower the marginal rate," says Mr. Wills. "That can be a good tax planning strategy for the future."

More Articles for Orthopedic Surgeons:

10 Steps for Surgeons to Overcome the Fiscal Cliff

5 Healthcare Reform Threats to Spine Surgeons & How to Overcome Them

15 Statistics Comparing Orthopedic Surgeon Compensation to Other Specialties


Viewing all 23847 articles
Browse latest View live